fsharp.org
proposal-type-annotations
fsharp.org | proposal-type-annotations | |
---|---|---|
7 | 101 | |
290 | 4,101 | |
1.4% | 0.8% | |
5.6 | 4.7 | |
2 months ago | 2 months ago | |
TeX | JavaScript | |
- | - |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
fsharp.org
-
Top Paying Programming Technologies 2024
3. F# - $99,311
-
Roc – A fast, friendly, functional language
Oh yeah. A key hindrance of F# is that MS treats it like a side project even though it's probably their secret weapon, and a lot of the adopters are dotnet coders who already know the basics so the on-boarding is less than ideal.
https://fsharp.org/ is the best place to actually start.
https://fsharpforfunandprofit.com/ is the standard recommendation from there but there's finally some good youtube and other content out there.
-
Building React Components Using Unions in TypeScript
Naturally I’d recommend using a better language such as ReScript or Elm or PureScript or F#‘s Fable + Elmish, but “React” is the king right now and people perceive TypeScript as “less risky” for jobs/hiring, so here we are.
- Earning the privilege to work on unoriginal problems
-
I am a ChatGPT bot - Ask me anything #2
Are you really a bot? Yes, I'm a small F# program that glues together the public API's provided by Reddit and OpenAI. I was created by /u/brianberns. You can find my source code here.
-
I am a ChatGPT bot
The bot is written in F#, which is a .NET language (like C#).
-
Full Paket Tutorial Video (Paket vs NuGet for F# Package Management)
I created an issue here for the documentation change: https://github.com/fsharp/fsfoundation/issues/857
proposal-type-annotations
-
Bun 1.1
That proposal is not fully compatible with Typescript: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-type-annotations?tab=readme...
-
Go 1.22 Release Notes
They held a meeting a few months ago so it's alive but probably still years away.
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-type-annotations/issues/184
-
[AskJS] Kicking a dead horse - TS vs JS
I particularly like this thread in the TC39 types proposal. TypeScript IS a development trojan horse and locks you into the Microsoft Way of being a JS developer.
- Strong static typing, a hill I'm willing to die on...
-
HTML First – Six principles for building simple, maintainable, web software
Edit: There is a proposal to extend JavaScript with type annotations, which would allow ("a reasonably large subset") of TypeScript to run directly in the browser. Yay!
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-type-annotations
-
Building React Components Using Unions in TypeScript
More importantly, TypeScript typically commits to build things into itself when the proposal in JavaScript reaches Stage 3. The pattern matching proposal in JavaScript is Stage 1, but depends on many other proposals as well that may or may not need to be at Stage 3 as well for it to work. This particular proposal is interested on pattern matching on JavaScript Objects and other primitives, just like Python does with it’s native primitives. These are also dynamic types which helps in some areas, but makes it harder than others. Additionally, the JavaScript type annotations proposal needs to possibly account for this. So it’s going to be awhile. Like many years.
-
Show HN: Conway's Game of Life in TypeScript's type system
this is exactly what I want from the _Types as Comments_ proposal[0] as I think it's the only way that types can feasibly become part of the language. It's hard to imagine how all of the concepts TS introduces via special syntax can be covered otherwise.
[0] https://tc39.es/proposal-type-annotations
-
Why Htmx Does Not Have a Build Step
Crossing my fingers that the proposal for allowing (browser-ignored) type annotations in javascript progresses: https://tc39.es/proposal-type-annotations/
Between that, HTTP2/3 and ES modules many of the downsides for building apps with no compile step are almost completely mitigated.
-
TypeScript Without Transpilation
JSDoc can get you pretty far, but it can be clumsy sometimes. There’s a [TC39 proposal](https://github.com/tc39/proposal-type-annotations) to allow types to live in JS code and be treated as comments (similar with Python types today)
- Do you think typescript will ever have native support on brosers? Or we will have only the JS type annotations?
What are some alternatives?
effect - An ecosystem of tools to build robust applications in TypeScript.
astexplorer - A web tool to explore the ASTs generated by various parsers.
rescript-compiler - The compiler for ReScript.
Scala.js - Scala.js, the Scala to JavaScript compiler
askai - Command Line Interface for OpenAi ChatGPT
purescript - A strongly-typed language that compiles to JavaScript
Carp - A statically typed lisp, without a GC, for real-time applications.
proposal-pattern-matching - Pattern matching syntax for ECMAScript
d2-playground - An online runner to play, learn, and create with D2, the modern diagram scripting language that turns text to diagrams.
ts-adt - Generate Algebraic Data Types and pattern matchers
proposal-record-tuple - ECMAScript proposal for the Record and Tuple value types. | Stage 2: it will change!