fsharp-formatting-conventions
foundation-faq-2020
fsharp-formatting-conventions | foundation-faq-2020 | |
---|---|---|
1 | 6 | |
19 | 88 | |
- | - | |
3.0 | 0.0 | |
8 months ago | over 3 years ago | |
Apache License 2.0 | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
fsharp-formatting-conventions
-
Rust Foundation: Hello, World
Admittedly I work for a very opinionated team - we even have our own style guidelines (https://github.com/G-Research/fsharp-formatting-conventions) which are often in direct contradiction to Microsoft's, and my team strongly skews towards writing explicit type annotations on all function signatures. I can certainly see how there would be a problem if one defaulted to omitting type annotations.
foundation-faq-2020
-
Rust Foundation - Rust Trademark Policy Draft Revision – Next Steps
You can read all about it here, a great FAQ put together when the foundation was first started.
-
How our AWS Rust team will contribute to Rust’s future successes
No. As I understand it, https://github.com/rust-lang/foundation-faq-2020/blob/main/FAQ.md#q-hiring
-
Rust Foundation - Hello World!
Not quite 50/50, but from the FAQ (https://github.com/rust-lang/foundation-faq-2020/blob/main/FAQ.md#q-bylaws):
That is possible; see this FAQ for more details. But the foundation will start with small things and plans to extend its scope with time. It's unlikely that you'll notice a difference anytime soon. The foundation could potentially pay contributors for implementing features, but there are currently no plans for this.
-
Rust: “Move fast and break things” as a moral imperative
While Rust seems like a great programming language, I have come across some criticisms of it which appear to have some validity. Comparatively more impactful than what Drew describes here is the trademark problem that's listed on Hyperbola GNU/Linux site's webpage titled Rust's Freedom Flaws: https://wiki.hyperbola.info/doku.php?id=en:main:rusts_freedo...
*Please be aware that the rust project is now independent of Mozilla, so the following is not based on the latest information available.
Rust and also Cargo (the Rust package manager) violate the freedom to redistribute without “explicit” approval. Their trademark license imposes requirements for the distribution of modified versions that make it inconvenient to exercise freedom 3. The Rust's Media Guide says it merely supplements the official Mozilla trademark policy; it doesn't replace it. Since their trademark policy applies, then everything in that list (including Rust and Cargo) pulls in the same issue as Firefox and Thunderbird.
In short, Mozilla won't be happy with us applying patches and modifications to their trademarked language without “explicit approval”, except for non-commercial usage, so it is a freedom issue. For further references, there is a report in Rust about those trademark restrictions and Niko's response (one of the members of the Rust Legal Team).
I'm not an expert in this stuff, but this sounds like it could bear some weight. Currently the problem has not been resolved and it is still a matter to be considered by the rust board. Here is the latest thread on the problem I could find on the rust-lang GitHub: https://github.com/rust-lang/foundation-faq-2020/issues/35
-
Rust Foundation: Hello, World
They have an unhelpfully generic answer to that in their FAQ: "After spending a significant amount of time researching potential umbrella organizations, we decided that our best option was to incorporate an independent entity. Rust is a technology and community that is value driven and we simply didn’t find an organization that we felt was aligned with our community goals. This does mean more work for us, especially upfront, but we think the tradeoff is worth it."
https://github.com/rust-lang/foundation-faq-2020/blob/main/F...
What are some alternatives?
mask - 🎭 A CLI task runner defined by a simple markdown file
hyperscan - High-performance regular expression matching library
sqlx - 🧰 The Rust SQL Toolkit. An async, pure Rust SQL crate featuring compile-time checked queries without a DSL. Supports PostgreSQL, MySQL, and SQLite.
foundation.rust-lang.org - website for Rust Foundation
thanos-remote-read - Adapter to query Thanos StoreAPI with Prometheus remote read support.
ripgrep - ripgrep recursively searches directories for a regex pattern while respecting your gitignore
Rusoto - AWS SDK for Rust
rust-postgres - Native PostgreSQL driver for the Rust programming language
structopt - Parse command line arguments by defining a struct.