fourcolor VS coq-library-undecidability

Compare fourcolor vs coq-library-undecidability and see what are their differences.

fourcolor

Formal proof of the Four Color Theorem [maintainer=@ybertot] (by coq-community)

coq-library-undecidability

A library of mechanised undecidability proofs in the Coq proof assistant. (by uds-psl)
coq
Our great sponsors
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
fourcolor coq-library-undecidability
2 2
150 98
2.7% -
4.6 6.4
29 days ago 4 days ago
Coq Coq
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later Mozilla Public License 2.0
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

fourcolor

Posts with mentions or reviews of fourcolor. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-04-07.

coq-library-undecidability

Posts with mentions or reviews of coq-library-undecidability. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.
  • Development Environment with guix shell for Coq Package
    1 project | /r/GUIX | 21 Aug 2022
    I want to run guix shell to create an environment with the dependencies required to build coq-library-undecidability.
  • Math proof databases
    1 project | /r/mathematics | 14 Apr 2021
    There are two problems. The first is that there is no central repository. Sure, maybe if you're interested in undecidable results you might go here... But it's an island, and so is every other library. Worse yet, there's little inter mixing or combinable ways to use libraries. Unlike other programming languages, automated proof systems have so far been aimed at the technical aspects of a single person proving something, rather than the shareability of proofs.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing fourcolor and coq-library-undecidability you can also consider the following projects:

coq - Coq is a formal proof management system. It provides a formal language to write mathematical definitions, executable algorithms and theorems together with an environment for semi-interactive development of machine-checked proofs.

Coq-Equations - A function definition package for Coq

analysis - Mathematical Components compliant Analysis Library

corn - Coq Repository at Nijmegen [maintainers=@spitters,@VincentSe]

regexp-Brzozowski - Coq formalization of decision procedures for regular expression equivalence [maintainer=@anton-trunov]

verdi-raft - An implementation of the Raft distributed consensus protocol, verified in Coq using the Verdi framework

math-comp - Mathematical Components

magmide - A dependently-typed proof language intended to make provably correct bare metal code possible for working software engineers.

CompCert - The CompCert formally-verified C compiler

UniMath - This coq library aims to formalize a substantial body of mathematics using the univalent point of view.