forthlisp VS flpc

Compare forthlisp vs flpc and see what are their differences.

flpc

Forth Lisp Python Continuum: A small highly dynamic self-bootstrapping language (by asrp)
InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
forthlisp flpc
6 2
141 215
- -
0.0 0.0
about 3 years ago about 2 years ago
Forth Forth
- -
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

forthlisp

Posts with mentions or reviews of forthlisp. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-02-23.

flpc

Posts with mentions or reviews of flpc. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-11-17.
  • Forth vs Lisp
    3 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 17 Nov 2021
  • SubX: A minimalist assembly language for a subset of the x86 ISA
    8 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 20 Mar 2021
    > I've actually never considered putting the comment first! I'll have to think about that one.

    I'm sure there are many competing constraints so definitely don't do it because I'm suggesting this on a whim. :) My reasoning is that as a human reader, the comment is the more readable part, so I'd want to see it first. And for a computer, it probably doesn't care if the op code appears first or not.

    > You probably don't want to understand Haskell's loop fusion by comparing source and generated code.

    Indeed. But even though C and Haskell are very different, I think they share a common philosophy about compilation where you can basically do whatever you want as long as it still produces the same result.

    I vaguely remember looking at Python generate bytecode (with `dis.dis`) and seeing it wasn't too bad. I haven't tried it on a larger program though.

    There's tcc (and more recently chibicc that I haven't had a chance to check out yet) that you're probably already aware of. Is the generated output still pretty bad.

    I'll also throw my own attempt in the ring

    - High level https://github.com/asrp/flpc/blob/master/lib/stage0.flpc

What are some alternatives?

When comparing forthlisp and flpc you can also consider the following projects:

waforth - Small but complete dynamic Forth Interpreter/Compiler for and in WebAssembly

maru - Maru - a tiny self-hosting lisp dialect

raillisp - A fast and portable lisp implemented in forth

ruby - The Ruby Programming Language [mirror]

eulex - A straightforward standalone Forth implementation for x86.

cosmopolitan - build-once run-anywhere c library

paip-lisp - Lisp code for the textbook "Paradigms of Artificial Intelligence Programming"

collapseos - Bootstrap post-collapse technology

ESP32forth - FORTH developments for ESP32

Mako - A simple virtual game console

ok - An open-source interpreter for the K5 programming language.

jonesforth - Mirror of JONESFORTH