flyde VS plotnine

Yes! As a big fan of functional-reactive programming, it was important to me that Flyde builds on that foundation, and doesn't fall into more imperative paradigms.

With that being said, Flyde does offer an easy way for node authors to set local and global state, but in a functional way - you can pass your own map as the global state, and do whatever you want with it. It's not properly documented yet, but here's the code - https://github.com/flydelabs/flyde/blob/main/core/src/execut...

Run the following command:git clone https://github.com/FlydeHQ/flyde-discord-bot-boilerplate.git

To your last point, have you tried plotnine? It's meant to be ggplot2 for python.

https://github.com/has2k1/plotnine

plotnine - A grammar of graphics for Python based on ggplot2.

Github: https://github.com/has2k1/plotnine

This seems quite similar to plotnine [0], which also provides a grammar of graphics interface for Python. That said, I love ggplot and I can't wait to use this in my research! I hope we can port/re-implement ggthemes, scientificplots [1], and other ggplot libraries for lets-plot.

0: https://plotnine.readthedocs.io/en/stable/

1: https://github.com/garrettj403/SciencePlots

There is [plotnine](https://plotnine.readthedocs.io/en/stable/) which tries to implement ggplot in Python.

You could use plotnine if you like the grammar of graphics concept: https://plotnine.readthedocs.io/en/stable/

> Python doesn’t yet have anything remotely close to ggplot for rapidly making exploratory graphics, for example.

Plug for plotnine (https://plotnine.readthedocs.io/en/stable/). I don't know R but use ggplot indirectly through this library for exploratory data analysis, and comparing the experience to any other python plotting library, I understand why R folks are usually so sad to be using Python.

They have, https://plotnine.readthedocs.io/en/stable/