flowchart-fun VS mermaid

https://flowchart.fun recently helped a lot with a project.

- flowchart.fun - paid - https://flowchart.fun

flowchart.fun though!

On https://flowchart.fun I found that I got better overall results by asking GPT for an intermediate syntax that it was less likely to mess up (and easier for me to parse), and then parsing and transforming that syntax to my DSL. The relevant code: https://github.com/tone-row/flowchart-fun/blob/main/api/prom...

https://flowchart.fun is a good one if you're looking for something fast. (It's text-to-diagram)

That's the use-case we're angling for with our GPT integration on flowchart.fun

If you just need the image for your interface, you can generate one very quickly with https://flowchart.fun

Mermaid - https://mermaid.js.org/

This is an Issue I opened up for a potential feature. A couple weeks ago, I added nomnoml support to ChatCraft. ChatCraft renders previews for Mermaid and Nomnoml.

Mermaid JS is a powerful JavaScript library that allows developers to create complex diagrams and visualizations using simple text and code syntax. It’s a lot like markdown, but for charts instead of plain text.

Currently, ChatCraft supports Mermaid rendering. This feature request involves adding support for nomnoml rendering. Nomnoml is similar to Mermaid, in that they're both used in generating uml diagrams.

Marimo looks and feels great!

Have you considered adding support for mermaid.js in the markdown? I tried including some mermaid.js in a `mo.md` invocation, but it didn't render the diagram :-)

https://mermaid.js.org/

This feels like the LaTeX version of Mermaid.js [0]. I can do anything with it, but I gotta learn a lot of new syntax. So, really cool! Gonna have to dig into this.

[0] https://mermaid.js.org/