Expecto VS Fine Code Coverage

Compare Expecto vs Fine Code Coverage and see what are their differences.

Our great sponsors
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
Expecto Fine Code Coverage
2 1
654 485
- -
6.6 9.4
11 days ago about 1 month ago
F# C#
Apache License 2.0 GNU General Public License v3.0 or later
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

Expecto

Posts with mentions or reviews of Expecto. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-10-15.
  • Resources to learn the F# ecosystem
    3 projects | /r/fsharp | 15 Oct 2022
    Unit testing: I personally use FsUnit, specifically FsUnit.Xunit. There's some other libraries like Expecto and Hedgehog (property testing), but I haven't found a reason to use them. I recently started experimenting a little with Hedgehog. FsUnit integrates well into Visual Studio, since it sits nicely on top of NUnit and xUnit, and it's done everything I've needed so far.
  • Das.Test - an opinionated unit testing library written in F# for F#
    3 projects | /r/fsharp | 6 Feb 2022
    Beside, did you try Expecto? https://github.com/haf/expecto

Fine Code Coverage

Posts with mentions or reviews of Fine Code Coverage. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-03-07.
  • C# development tools
    2 projects | /r/csharp | 7 Mar 2022
    If you start writing unit tests, I highly recommend Fine Code Coverage to see what percentage of your code has been reached by the existing unit tests: https://github.com/FortuneN/FineCodeCoverage

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Expecto and Fine Code Coverage you can also consider the following projects:

xUnit - xUnit.net is a free, open source, community-focused unit testing tool for .NET.

SpecFlow - #1 .NET BDD Framework. SpecFlow automates your testing & works with your existing code. Find Bugs before they happen. Behavior Driven Development helps developers, testers, and business representatives to get a better understanding of their collaboration

FsCheck - Random Testing for .NET

MSTest - MSTest framework and adapter

NFluent - Smooth your .NET TDD experience with NFluent! NFluent is an ergonomic assertion library which aims to fluent your .NET TDD experience (based on simple Check.That() assertion statements). NFluent aims your tests to be fluent to write (with a super-duper-happy 'dot' auto-completion experience), fluent to read (i.e. as close as possible to plain English expression), but also fluent to troubleshoot, in a less-error-prone way comparing to the classical .NET test frameworks. NFluent is also directly inspired by the awesome Java FEST Fluent assertion/reflection library (http://fest.easytesting.org/)

NUnit - NUnit Framework

ReportGenerator - ReportGenerator converts coverage reports generated by coverlet, OpenCover, dotCover, Visual Studio, NCover, Cobertura, JaCoCo, Clover, gcov or lcov into human readable reports in various formats.

Canopy - f# web automation and testing library, built on top of Selenium (friendly to c# also)

CheckTestOutput - Semi-manual asserts for .NET unit tests

Fuchu - Functional test library for F# / C# / VB.NET

Shouldly - Should testing for .NET—the way assertions should be!