emails VS PushLock

Compare emails vs PushLock and see what are their differences.

InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
emails PushLock
5 1
214 3
- -
7.8 5.9
about 1 month ago 2 months ago
Perl C++
- -
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

emails

Posts with mentions or reviews of emails. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-03-03.

PushLock

Posts with mentions or reviews of PushLock. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-03-03.
  • Bug in std:shared_mutex on Windows
    7 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 3 Mar 2024
    https://www.reddit.com/r/cpp/comments/1b55686/comment/ktfggu...

    if say true - i here in very strange position. i am by self under debugger research exacly what happens in concrete case and create repro code. i think that implementation of the RtlReleaseSRWLockExclusive is not the best and may be really containing "bug" as i in more details describe in comment on reddit. but from another side, if you want pure formal c++ rules - can you explain - in what exactly was bug in concre case ? what rule/guarantee is violated ? why demo code decide that ALL shared waiters can at once acquire the lock. formal documentation not state this. this intuitive must be true, because no exclusive request more. but.. i really dont know. and i also for fun create own implementation of SRW lock ( if someone interested to look -https://github.com/rbmm/PushLock ) which free from this roblem - i always ( hope) do only single atomic change to lock state during api call. and finally - sorry for my english and too long answer

What are some alternatives?

When comparing emails and PushLock you can also consider the following projects:

boto3 - AWS SDK for Python

SRW-2 - shared to exclusive

cpp-docs - C++ Documentation

SRW_ALT