coffeescript
proposal-do-expressions
coffeescript | proposal-do-expressions | |
---|---|---|
1 | 19 | |
4 | 1,066 | |
- | 2.3% | |
2.0 | 0.0 | |
10 months ago | about 3 years ago | |
CoffeeScript | HTML | |
MIT License | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
coffeescript
-
HypeScript: Simplified TypeScript's type system in TypeScript's own type system
This already exists, see [1]. Development has a bit stalled, but afaik the author wants to keep pursuing it. There's even a Discord server for this kind of project, see also this GitHub thread [2] where CS+TS is being discussed in general. Alternatively, you can code in Coffee with JSDoc type annotations, yielding a near-TypeScript experience in both IDE and output, albeit the annotation syntax can be a bit annoying, ironically.
[1] https://github.com/edemaine/coffeescript/blob/typescript/tes...
proposal-do-expressions
-
TypeScript Is Surprisingly OK for Compilers
> no pattern matching/switch expressions
They're still waiting on the do expression proposal for that (https://github.com/tc39/proposal-do-expressions), which has been in the bikeshedding stage for the past five years.
-
[AskJS] Opinions on using self executing functions as multi-line expressions.
At some point, it may be superseded by do blocks, but for now it's really your best bet.
-
What is this called? { id ? <Dashboard/> : <Login/> } and can I make it check for multiple things like a switch case?
But there is a proposal for do-expression : https://github.com/tc39/proposal-do-expressions
-
Using {Blocks} in Rust & Go for Fun & Profit
It's also the reason why do expressions are my most anticipated feature for JS.
-
Pipe Operator (|>) For JavaScript
> They should repurpose `do` so that `do {}` (without the `while`) is an expression that you can put statements inside and return the last statement.
There's a proposal for precisely that. Unfortunately, only Stage 1 though.
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-do-expressions
- Is a single ternary operator inside the returned JSX acceptable?
-
[AskJS] Is there ever a good use for loose blocks in JS?
It's one of the main reasons why I really want the do-expression propsal to work out, because then it would become:
- The TC39 Process
-
[AskJS] What are still present issues in contemporary (2022) JavaScript?
Do blocks. Okay, this is actually a proposal so maybe someday. Basically blocks that can resolve to an expression.
-
'The best thing we can do today to JavaScript is to retire it,' says JSON creator Douglas Crockford • DEVCLASS
Tomorrow, do expressions:
What are some alternatives?
Super-Template-Tetris - Tetris as a C++ Template Metaprogram
native-messaging-bash - Bash Native Messaging host.
HypeScript - 🐬 A simplified implementation of TypeScript's type system written in TypeScript's type system
captureSystemAudio - Capture system audio ("What-U-Hear")
proposal-slice-notation
proposal-pipeline-operator - A proposal for adding a useful pipe operator to JavaScript.
oni2 - Native, lightweight modal code editor
proposal-upsert - ECMAScript Proposal, specs, and reference implementation for Map.prototype.upsert
ts-sql - A SQL database implemented purely in TypeScript type annotations.
caya - a tiny useful simple language experiment
proposal-array-equality - Determining Array Equality
proposal-pattern-matching - Pattern matching syntax for ECMAScript