heron VS meta

Compare heron vs meta and see what are their differences.

meta

A community dedicated to supporting tools for technical and scientific communication and interactive computing (by executablebooks)
InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
heron meta
1 2
15 122
- 2.5%
0.0 5.1
about 2 years ago 6 days ago
Java
- -
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

heron

Posts with mentions or reviews of heron. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-09-07.
  • Show HN: Arxiv.org on IPFS
    6 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 7 Sep 2021
    Ah cool… I also took a stab at something similar several years ago: https://github.com/ecausarano/heron

    Also at the time I was considering IPFS.

    But I guess the real trick is implementing a WOT to implement peer review and filter out the inevitable junk that will be published

meta

Posts with mentions or reviews of meta. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-01-24.
  • Certified 100% AI-Free Organic content
    2 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 24 Jan 2023
    https://github.com/executablebooks/meta/discussions/102

    Re: fact checks, schema.org/ClaimReview, W3C Verifiable Claims, W3C Verifiable News & Epistemology: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15529140

  • Show HN: Arxiv.org on IPFS
    6 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 7 Sep 2021
    https://github.com/executablebooks/meta/discussions/102 :

    > jupyter-comment supports a number of commenting services ([executablebooks/sphinx-comments#14](https://github.com/executablebooks/sphinx-comments/issues/14) , [executablebooks/jupyter-book#861](https://github.com/executablebooks/jupyter-book/issues/861)). In helping users decide which commenting and annotation services to include on their pages and commit to maintaining, could we discuss criteria for assessment and current features of services?

    > Possible features for comparison:

    > * Content author can delete / hide

    > * Content author can report / block

    > * Comments / annotations are screened by spam-fighting service

    > * Content / author can label as e.g. toxic

    > * Content author receives notification of new comments

    > * Content author can require approval before user-contributed content is publicly-visible

    > * Content author may allow comments for a limited amount of time (probably more relevant to BlogPostings)

    > * Content author may simultaneously denounce censorship in all it's forms while allowing previously-published works to languish

What are some alternatives?

When comparing heron and meta you can also consider the following projects:

jupyter-book - Create beautiful, publication-quality books and documents from computational content.

lbry-desktop - A browser and wallet for LBRY, the decentralized, user-controlled content marketplace.

sphinx-comments - hypothes.is interaction layer with Sphinx