easy-routes VS lisp-for-the-web

Compare easy-routes vs lisp-for-the-web and see what are their differences.

easy-routes

Yet another routes handling utility on top of Hunchentoot (by mmontone)
Lisp Web hunchentoot Routing common-lisp
Source Code
Suggest alternative
Edit details

lisp-for-the-web

Code for lisp for the web post (by rajasegar)
common-lisp caveman2 Lisp hunchentoot djula
Source Code
lisp-for-the-web.herokuapp.com
Suggest alternative
Edit details
InfluxDB
Our great sponsors
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
Our great sponsors
easy-routes lisp-for-the-web
1 1
53 2
- -
5.2 2.6
21 days ago almost 3 years ago
Common Lisp Common Lisp
MIT License -
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

easy-routes

Posts with mentions or reviews of easy-routes. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.
  • Best way to add users & authentication to web app with Hunchentoot server?
    1 project | /r/lisp | 1 Mar 2021
    I am using easy-routes and its "decorators" approach for authorization https://github.com/mmontone/easy-routes + the Can library for control rights https://github.com/fukamachi/can => https://gitlab.com/myopenbookstore/openbookstore/-/blob/master/src/web/authentication.lisp + https://gitlab.com/myopenbookstore/openbookstore/-/blob/master/src/web/web.lisp#L93

lisp-for-the-web

Posts with mentions or reviews of lisp-for-the-web. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-07-03.
  • Lisp for the Web - 5
    7 projects | dev.to | 3 Jul 2021
    {% extends "layouts/default.html" %} {% block title %}Lisp for the web{% endblock %} {% block content %} id="main"> Lisp for the Web href="/">Home href="/about">About Source Code: href="https://github.com/rajasegar/lisp-for-the-web">Github

What are some alternatives?

When comparing easy-routes and lisp-for-the-web you can also consider the following projects:

land-of-lisp-using-hunchentoot - Convert code for "Dice of Doom" from Barski's "Land of Lisp" to use Hunchentoot web server.

caveman - Lightweight web application framework for Common Lisp.

hunchentoot-errors - Augments Hunchentoot error pages and logs with request and session information.

deprecated-coalton-prototype - Coalton is (supposed to be) a dialect of ML embedded in Common Lisp.

cl-calendar - A Calendar demo in Common Lisp

cl-jingle - Common Lisp web framework with bells and whistles (based on ningle)

heroku-buildpack-roswell - Heroku Roswell Buildpack

OMGlib - A Common Lisp library to build fully dynamic web interfaces

slime - The Superior Lisp Interaction Mode for Emacs

weblocks - This fork was created to experiment with some refactorings. They are collected in branch "reblocks".

clack - Web server abstraction layer for Common Lisp

easy-routes vs land-of-lisp-using-hunchentoot lisp-for-the-web vs caveman easy-routes vs caveman lisp-for-the-web vs hunchentoot-errors easy-routes vs deprecated-coalton-prototype lisp-for-the-web vs cl-calendar easy-routes vs cl-jingle lisp-for-the-web vs heroku-buildpack-roswell easy-routes vs OMGlib lisp-for-the-web vs slime easy-routes vs weblocks lisp-for-the-web vs clack