dockerc VS ruby-packer

Compare dockerc vs ruby-packer and see what are their differences.

dockerc

container image to single executable compiler (by NilsIrl)
Containers Docker OCI oci-image
Source Code
Suggest alternative
Edit details

ruby-packer

Packing your Ruby application into a single executable. (by ericbeland)
Suggest topics
Source Code
Suggest alternative
Edit details
InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
dockerc ruby-packer
5 2
1,447 103
- -
7.0 4.2
2 months ago 6 months ago
Zig Ruby
GNU General Public License v3.0 only MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

dockerc

Posts with mentions or reviews of dockerc. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-03-06.
  • Show HN: dockerc – Docker image to static executable "compiler"
    12 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 6 Mar 2024
    The main reason Zig was chosen is because the project was started at a hackathon[0] at which there was a prize for "best use of Zig". Beyond that there were also other reasons: 1. I have been wanting to try out Zig 2. It fit the requirement of being a so called "systems language".

    However having written it in Zig I have a few retroactive reasons for why Zig was a good choice (if not the best choice):

    * The build system allows to make the runtime a dependency of the "compiler". I don't think any other language has that.

    * The interoperability with C/systems calls is amazing (in comparison to anything but C/C++)

    * The ability to embed files

    [0]: https://treehacks.com/

    [1]: https://github.com/NilsIrl/dockerc/blob/68b0e6dc40e76c77ad0c...

ruby-packer

Posts with mentions or reviews of ruby-packer. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-03-06.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing dockerc and ruby-packer you can also consider the following projects:

macos-cross-compiler - Compile binaries for macOS on Linux

traveling-ruby - Self-contained Portable Ruby ( 2.6.10 -> 3.3.x ) Binaries for Linux/MacOS/Windows

crun - A fast and lightweight fully featured OCI runtime and C library for running containers

container2wasm - Container to WASM converter

wasmer - 🚀 The leading Wasm Runtime supporting WASIX, WASI and Emscripten

enroot - A simple yet powerful tool to turn traditional container/OS images into unprivileged sandboxes.

dockerc vs macos-cross-compiler dockerc vs traveling-ruby dockerc vs crun dockerc vs container2wasm dockerc vs wasmer dockerc vs enroot