docker-jitsi-meet VS prometheus

Jitsi Meet for selfhosted Video Meetings

With this version I am facing the same issue as describef by you. This version is broken: https://github.com/jitsi/docker-jitsi-meet/issues/1377

Most video conferencing suites allow starting a call with video disabled so they don't block you from using only audio all the time. Most video suites will also provide either a docker container or suite of containers via docker-compose to get you started quickly. Personally, I host Jitsi using https://github.com/jitsi/docker-jitsi-meet. If you want to try before you host then you can use https://meet.jit.si/ which is the free/public Jitsi instance. They don't require accounts to try. When you host it yourself, there's even an end-to-end encryption option you can enable.

proxy_http_version 1.1 may not be necessary. I copied it from the nginx configuration files included in the official jitsi docker images. I think they are making sure that no HTTP 1.0 requests are made because websockets aren't supported on 1.0. It would be rare for a device to use 1.0 these days, though.

If you need to configure options that are not supported through the ".env" file then, first, be sure to open an issue because the Jitsi maintainers intend for ".env" to manage all the configurations. From there, you can inject only your configuration overrides for the config.json by mounting it in your container as "/config/custom-config.json". This would look like a ' - "/path/to/my/config.json:/config/custom-config.json' entry in the "volumes" section of your docker compose. See https://github.com/jitsi/docker-jitsi-meet/issues/768 for a discussion on this.

https://github.com/jitsi/docker-jitsi-meet/blob/master/docker-compose.yml <-- this is the docker-compose.yml in the official repository, did you tried it?

download the latest release from https://github.com/jitsi/docker-jitsi-meet/releases (at time of writing stable-6173: release)

+1 Jitsi, but host it yourself! This is the Docker install that let's you customize the experience. Browser or app based, platform-agnostic, fully encrypted back to your container, with the option to register a SIP endpoint for people to be able to dial into the conference via your IP PBX and do audio-only conferencing. Jitsi does ALMOST everything that Teams / Zoom can do but for regular conferences with screen sharing, it's hard to beat. I built a web scheduler that initializes meetings via JWT so no inadvertent meetings can start without the organizer, solving one of the drawbacks.

Jitsi is pretty secure and private with using meet.jit.si their server. Also it supports all the devices Android IOS PC and Mac. For your small group I would give it a shot and see what you think. As for server, yes it can be done - https://www.osradar.com/deploy-jitsi-meet-server-with-docker/ or https://github.com/jitsi/docker-jitsi-meet I had issues with Android getting connected so we just use meet.jit.si and it all works fine with 3 people.

It's like Prometheus, but for logs. Okay it's not really to do with the Norse or Greek gods, instead Loki is a horizontally-scalable, highly-available, multi-tenant log aggregation system inspired by the open source project Prometheus. Built by Grafana Labs, Loki is designed for ease of use. Instead of indexing the contents of the logs, Loki provides a set of labels for each log stream. The latest update includes query acceleration with Bloom filters, native OTel support, Helm charts, and more. Check out the changelog for all the major changes and deprecations.

WriteRequest::timeseries is a vector (https://github.com/prometheus/prometheus/blob/main/prompb/re...) and

Developers widely use Prometheus as a system for operational monitoring and alerting for their projects. Here is a list of tools for monitoring frontend services with Prometheus.

Just to give an example of the power of Go for CLI builds, you may have already used or at least heard of Docker, Kubernetes, Prometheus, Terraform, but what do they all have in common? They all have a large part of their usability via CLI and are developed in Go 🐿.

Distributed system administrators need mechanisms and tools for monitoring individual nodes in order to analyze the system and promptly detect anomalies. Developers also need effective mechanisms for analyzing, diagnosing issues, and identifying bugs in protocol implementations. Logging, tracing, and collecting metrics are common observability techniques to allow monitoring and obtaining diagnostic information from the system; most of the explored code bases use these techniques. OpenTelemetry and Prometheus are popular open-source monitoring solutions, which are used in many of the explored code bases.

Setting up monitoring for a system, especially one involving GRPC communication, provides crucial visibility into its operations. In this guide, we walked through the steps to instrument both a GRPC server and client with Prometheus metrics, exposed those metrics via an HTTP endpoint, and visualized them using Grafana. The Docker-Compose setup simplified the deployment of both Prometheus and Grafana, ensuring a streamlined process.

Alerting and Notification: Select a tool with flexible alerting mechanisms to proactively detect anomalies or deviations from defined thresholds. Consider asking questions like "Does this tool offer customizable alerting options and support notification channels that suit our team's communication preferences?" A tool like Prometheus provides robust alerting capabilities.

Prometheus

Prometheus is an open-source monitoring and alerting toolkit. It is designed to monitor highly dynamic containerized systems, making it an excellent choice for monitoring Docker containers and Kubernetes clusters.

wget https://github.com/prometheus/prometheus/releases/download/v2.46.0/prometheus-2.46.0.linux-amd64.tar.gz