deploy-cloudrun VS vite

Examples for products in this category are: Google Cloud Run, AWS App Runner, Azure Container Apps. Each has different scalability, cost, and integration trade-offs.

Cloud Run is a managed platform that enables you to run container based workloads on top of Google infrastructure. Cloud Run automates many of the above steps and allows you to focus on developing and deploying updates to your application.

Serverless computing was also introduced, where the developers focus on their code instead of server configuration.Google offers serverless technologies that include Cloud Functions and Cloud Run.Cloud Functions manages event-driven code and offers a pay-as-you-go service, while Cloud Run allows clients to deploy their containerized microservice applications in a managed environment.

The quickest way is to deploy to Cloud Run. The service will use Dockerfile to build the production image. You can even omit the GOOGLE_APPLICATION_CREDENTIALS env var as these are in GCP’s projects by default.

In our company we use Google Cloud Run to deploy web applications, and every app is built into a docker image. For now we use the default memory limit by Cloud Run which is 256 MB per container. Recently we started to notice that the part of applications go beyond this limit, causing a container to restart and in some cases even resulting to downtime of a service.

It's perhaps a little fiddlier than other options, but you can probably host it on Google Cloud Run and it would fall within the free tier.

You can see more here on how to use the google cloud run github actions.

I wonder what the aversion is to using a plain old server / vps. It's really not that difficult to deploy nowadays [0][1][2][3] and I'd rather get an $8 bill every month as insurance than ever worry about shit like OP just went through. It'll probably be more performant anyway due to cold starts and "edge" still having to hit us-east-1 for data.. cache your static files with Cloud Flare/Front. People are always surprised by how much traffic a single VPS can take[4] and believe it all has to be serverless to be web scale. I believe HN still runs on a single core or something.

There's a ton of places to get cloud credits as well, too many to link, so just Bing™ it

[0] https://docs.aws.amazon.com/cdk/api/v2/docs/aws-cdk-lib.aws_...

[1] https://aws.amazon.com/apprunner/

[2] https://cloud.google.com/run

[3] https://render.com/

[4] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34676186

Google Cloud Run

As of this writing, initializing a Hattip project requires some manual commands. However, keep in mind that a zero-config development environment based on Vite is in the works.

import { defineConfig } from 'vite' import react from '@vitejs/plugin-react' // https://vitejs.dev/config/ export default defineConfig({ plugins: [react()], server: { port: 4200, } })

For the frontend of "I Disappear," I leverage the automated build & deploy system provided by Netlify, which seamlessly integrates with Vite. This setup ensures that every deployment is optimized for performance, utilizing Vite’s modern build tools to enhance speed and efficiency.

Given our team's collective proficiency within the React ecosystem, we decided to leverage this expertise for our project. Initially, we contemplated utilizing Next.js; however, due to the limited practical experience with this technology among key engineers and the pressing timeline to develop the first prototype, we opted for a Single Page Application(SPA) approach. For bundling, we selected Vite, primarily due to its super fast build times, simplicity of configuration, and potential for a nearly seamless transition to server-side rendering.

We are continuing to add new project templates for various types of projects, and we've recently created one for the infamous combination of React with Vite tooling.

Vite focuses on providing an extremely fast development server and workflow speed in web development. It uses its own ES module imports during development, speeding up the startup time.

Vite and Next.js are both top 5 modern development framework right now. They are both great depending on your use case so we’ll discuss 4 areas: Architecture, main features, developer experience and production readiness. After learning about these we’ll have a better idea of which one is best for your project.

import { defineConfig } from 'vite' import react from '@vitejs/plugin-react-swc' import path from 'path' // https://vitejs.dev/config/ export default defineConfig({ plugins: [react()], server: { port: 3000 }, css: { devSourcemap: true }, resolve: { alias: { '~': path.resolve(__dirname, './src') } } })

I am currently utilizing Vite:

Homepage: https://vitejs.dev/