deploy-cloudrun VS vercel

Examples for products in this category are: Google Cloud Run, AWS App Runner, Azure Container Apps. Each has different scalability, cost, and integration trade-offs.

Cloud Run is a managed platform that enables you to run container based workloads on top of Google infrastructure. Cloud Run automates many of the above steps and allows you to focus on developing and deploying updates to your application.

Serverless computing was also introduced, where the developers focus on their code instead of server configuration.Google offers serverless technologies that include Cloud Functions and Cloud Run.Cloud Functions manages event-driven code and offers a pay-as-you-go service, while Cloud Run allows clients to deploy their containerized microservice applications in a managed environment.

The quickest way is to deploy to Cloud Run. The service will use Dockerfile to build the production image. You can even omit the GOOGLE_APPLICATION_CREDENTIALS env var as these are in GCP’s projects by default.

In our company we use Google Cloud Run to deploy web applications, and every app is built into a docker image. For now we use the default memory limit by Cloud Run which is 256 MB per container. Recently we started to notice that the part of applications go beyond this limit, causing a container to restart and in some cases even resulting to downtime of a service.

It's perhaps a little fiddlier than other options, but you can probably host it on Google Cloud Run and it would fall within the free tier.

You can see more here on how to use the google cloud run github actions.

I wonder what the aversion is to using a plain old server / vps. It's really not that difficult to deploy nowadays [0][1][2][3] and I'd rather get an $8 bill every month as insurance than ever worry about shit like OP just went through. It'll probably be more performant anyway due to cold starts and "edge" still having to hit us-east-1 for data.. cache your static files with Cloud Flare/Front. People are always surprised by how much traffic a single VPS can take[4] and believe it all has to be serverless to be web scale. I believe HN still runs on a single core or something.

There's a ton of places to get cloud credits as well, too many to link, so just Bing™ it

[0] https://docs.aws.amazon.com/cdk/api/v2/docs/aws-cdk-lib.aws_...

[1] https://aws.amazon.com/apprunner/

[2] https://cloud.google.com/run

[3] https://render.com/

[4] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34676186

Google Cloud Run

Next, we'll deploy our ecommerce website to Vercel (which is a great choice to host your Next.js website). Other hosting options include Netlify and Render.

This approach has seen a proliferation of platforms that offer this as a service(Netlify, Vercel, Cloudflare etc.) and also a proliferation of frameworks with different strengths and weaknesses(list of frameworks supported cloudflare).

Next.js: Highly optimized for production from the start, with features tailored for performance in real-world scenarios, including extensive support for SEO and server-side capabilities. Note: With deployment to Vercel is free and comes with additional free tooling such as website analytics and more.

Easily deploy your Next.js app with Vercel by clicking the button below:

Now go to https://vercel.com, sign up for an account, and click "New Project". Connect your GitHub account and give Vercel permission to access your repositories.

Next.js has become a standard choice for developing React applications, offering various deployment options across different platforms. While Vercel is a popular choice for building and deployment, specific project requirements may require deployment to GitLab. In this guide, I'll illustrate the process of deploying a Next.js application to GitLab Pages.

I hosted my portfolio in Vercel. The main reason why I chose it is the hosting has great support for NextJS and IMPORTANT THING, it is total FREE 🤑 (with my usage). And I have use GitHub Action for deploy it automatically when I make or merge change into main branch.

To do this just head over to Vercel and log in if you're not already logged in. If this is your first project, you'll be seeing something like this.

function getContentSecurityPolicyHeaderValue( nonce: string, reportUri: string, ): string { // Default CSP for Next.js const contentSecurityPolicyDirective = { 'base-uri': [`'self'`], 'default-src': [`'none'`], 'frame-ancestors': [`'none'`], 'font-src': [`'self'`], 'form-action': [`'self'`], 'frame-src': [`'self'`], 'connect-src': [`'self'`], 'img-src': [`'self'`], 'manifest-src': [`'self'`], 'object-src': [`'none'`], 'report-uri': [reportUri], // for old browsers like Firefox 'report-to': ['csp'], // for modern browsers like Chrome 'script-src': [ `'nonce-${nonce}'`, `'strict-dynamic'`, // force hashes and nonces over domain host lists ], 'style-src': [`'self'`], } if (process.env.NODE_ENV === 'development') { // Webpack use eval() in development mode for automatic JS reloading contentSecurityPolicyDirective['script-src'].push(`'unsafe-eval'`) } if (process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_VERCEL_ENV === 'preview') { contentSecurityPolicyDirective['connect-src'].push('https://vercel.live') contentSecurityPolicyDirective['connect-src'].push('wss://*.pusher.com') contentSecurityPolicyDirective['img-src'].push('https://vercel.com') contentSecurityPolicyDirective['font-src'].push('https://vercel.live') contentSecurityPolicyDirective['frame-src'].push('https://vercel.live') contentSecurityPolicyDirective['style-src'].push('https://vercel.live') } return Object.entries(contentSecurityPolicyDirective) .map(([key, value]) => `${key} ${value.join(' ')}`) .join('; ') }

This is a demo project to demonstrate how a Web2 frontend hosted on VERCEL can access a Motoko backend canister on the Internet Computer using Server Side Rendering (SSR).