deckdeckgo VS stencil

We are developing a proof of concept to port our web app, DeckDeckGo, to DFINITY's Internet Computer.

Exciting news, we received a 25k USD grant from the DFINITY foundation to port our web editor for slides, DeckDeckGo, to the Internet Computer.

I recently developed plugins and, migrated all the utilities of DeckDeckGo to build these with esbuild.

I recently published a new open source plugin to export Figma frames to DeckDeckGo slides.

Anyone can try out DeckDeckGo, there is no mandatory login or sign-in upfront if you just want to give it a try. It is something really important to us, we are not chasing data or number of users, we are developing an editor for presentations for users’ who want to use it, or not 😉. That being said, if users want to share publicly their presentations, because we don’t want to have too much “This is a test” or “Yolo” decks publicly published, respectively avoid if possible not meaningful public content, we do restrict our “publishing process” (the one in which we transform and deploy the presentations online as Progressive Web Apps), to signed users. For these processes, we are using the ability given by Firebase to use anonymous users. That’s why, in addition to verify the tokens, I also add to check this information. Fortunately, this can also be solved easily, as the payload provided by the verifyToken function does contain such information.

First a disclosure: I never actually used Stencil, only played with it a bit locally in a hello-world project while writing this post.

This is my main concern too.

I don't understand why tools like this "pick a winner" with a specific framework instead of rendering to Web Components with a framework wrapper, or using something like Stencil[1] that can render to any framework.

[1] https://stenciljs.com/

I was recently able to sit down with some of the core members of Ionic, who also created Stencil a toolchain for building Design Systems and Progressive Web Apps. We talked at great length how typically companies are approaching Ionic from a Design Team and need help building components. As a developer I wanted to talk about the Web Components that are used within the Design System first. There was a decent amount of surprise, so I thought I would break down what a Design System is and why it doesn't matter which end you start with, as long as you have both your Design and Development teams working together to build your Design System.

Examples like this bug me. The React example is using a high level abstraction, the web component is directly using the API. A more accurate example would show how those React calls eventually boil down to document.createElement()

I don’t think the Web Components API was meant to be used directly all the time. You can use a framework like StencilJS:

https://stenciljs.com/

You might say that this is the same vicious cycle as JavaScript frameworks. That's wrong, because Web Components are interoperable by design. Choosing Stencil or Lit or any other library is a development convenience that has little to do with the interoperability of the resulting components.

Not sure about Vue but you can in Angular, though my experience with React components in Angular has not been pleasant. Libraries such as Stencil allow you to create native Web Componets from React components.

I guess my problem is more specific to my overall architecture. I have components that when are placed in the DOM, have props rendered on them by their parent elements. I'm using stencil to do this.