dax
proposal-type-annotations
dax | proposal-type-annotations | |
---|---|---|
4 | 101 | |
927 | 4,100 | |
- | 0.7% | |
8.6 | 4.7 | |
7 days ago | about 2 months ago | |
TypeScript | JavaScript | |
MIT License | - |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
dax
-
Bun 1.1
> Also with Deno, it become very easy to write typed cli. .ts file can be run as script very easily with permission access defined on top of the script such as:
I do this all the time. I used to use npx in my hashbang line to run TS scripts with node, but I've started using Deno more because of the permissions. Another great package for shell scripting with Deno is Dax, which is like the Deno version of Bun shell: https://github.com/dsherret/dax
> Also project such as https://cliffy.io has made writing cli way more enjoyable than node.
This looks cool. I've always used the npm package inquirer (which also works with Deno), but I'll have to compare cliffy to that and see how it stacks up.
> Hono (projects conform to modern web standard, and is runtime agnostic for JS)
Hono is awesome. It's fast, very well typed, runs on all JS runtimes, and has zero dependencies.
-
The Bun Shell
Great point! According to https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/blob/b433beb016470b87850f3c01..., Bun Shell took inspiration from zx[0], dax[1] and bnx[2]
[0]: https://github.com/google/zx
[1]: https://github.com/dsherret/dax
[2]: https://github.com/wobsoriano/bnx
-
Create scripts in JavaScript with zx
Found a good alternative for deno: https://github.com/dsherret/dax
proposal-type-annotations
-
Bun 1.1
That proposal is not fully compatible with Typescript: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-type-annotations?tab=readme...
-
Go 1.22 Release Notes
They held a meeting a few months ago so it's alive but probably still years away.
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-type-annotations/issues/184
-
[AskJS] Kicking a dead horse - TS vs JS
I particularly like this thread in the TC39 types proposal. TypeScript IS a development trojan horse and locks you into the Microsoft Way of being a JS developer.
- Strong static typing, a hill I'm willing to die on...
-
HTML First – Six principles for building simple, maintainable, web software
Edit: There is a proposal to extend JavaScript with type annotations, which would allow ("a reasonably large subset") of TypeScript to run directly in the browser. Yay!
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-type-annotations
-
Building React Components Using Unions in TypeScript
More importantly, TypeScript typically commits to build things into itself when the proposal in JavaScript reaches Stage 3. The pattern matching proposal in JavaScript is Stage 1, but depends on many other proposals as well that may or may not need to be at Stage 3 as well for it to work. This particular proposal is interested on pattern matching on JavaScript Objects and other primitives, just like Python does with it’s native primitives. These are also dynamic types which helps in some areas, but makes it harder than others. Additionally, the JavaScript type annotations proposal needs to possibly account for this. So it’s going to be awhile. Like many years.
-
Show HN: Conway's Game of Life in TypeScript's type system
this is exactly what I want from the _Types as Comments_ proposal[0] as I think it's the only way that types can feasibly become part of the language. It's hard to imagine how all of the concepts TS introduces via special syntax can be covered otherwise.
[0] https://tc39.es/proposal-type-annotations
-
Why Htmx Does Not Have a Build Step
Crossing my fingers that the proposal for allowing (browser-ignored) type annotations in javascript progresses: https://tc39.es/proposal-type-annotations/
Between that, HTTP2/3 and ES modules many of the downsides for building apps with no compile step are almost completely mitigated.
-
TypeScript Without Transpilation
JSDoc can get you pretty far, but it can be clumsy sometimes. There’s a [TC39 proposal](https://github.com/tc39/proposal-type-annotations) to allow types to live in JS code and be treated as comments (similar with Python types today)
- Do you think typescript will ever have native support on brosers? Or we will have only the JS type annotations?
What are some alternatives?
cinnamon - A Linux desktop featuring a traditional layout, built from modern technology and introducing brand new innovative features.
astexplorer - A web tool to explore the ASTs generated by various parsers.
awesome-tagged-templates - A list of libraries and learning resources for ES2015 tagged template literals
Scala.js - Scala.js, the Scala to JavaScript compiler
exa-kernel - EXA Kernel
rescript-compiler - The compiler for ReScript.
bnx - zx inspired shell for Bun.
Carp - A statically typed lisp, without a GC, for real-time applications.
d2-playground - An online runner to play, learn, and create with D2, the modern diagram scripting language that turns text to diagrams.
proposal-record-tuple - ECMAScript proposal for the Record and Tuple value types. | Stage 2: it will change!
deno - A modern runtime for JavaScript and TypeScript.
assemblyscript - A TypeScript-like language for WebAssembly.