danger-js
web-vitals
Our great sponsors
danger-js | web-vitals | |
---|---|---|
6 | 140 | |
5,151 | 7,113 | |
0.4% | 2.2% | |
7.5 | 7.7 | |
8 days ago | 13 days ago | |
TypeScript | JavaScript | |
MIT License | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
danger-js
-
Enforcing ESLint rules: A guide to taming codebase chaos
Make sure to not accept any Pull Request with commented ESLint errors to ensure a continuous improvement of your codebase quality. Some tools can help you to automate this part of the review, such as Danger JS.
-
How We Started Managing BSA Delivery Processes on GitHub
commitlint & dangerjs. Linters that help maintain consistency in all user-provided information related to Git and GitHub (commits, branch names, PR titles, etc.).
- DangerJS – automate common code review chores
- PRcop – open-source Pull Request linter for Github Actions built with JS
-
How to deal with teammates forcing personal preference into code reviews and nit picking everything?
Does your team use any automatic code formatting or linting tools? E.g. for TypeScript or JavaScript, a combination of Prettier and ESLint, with a well understood and agreed-upon configuration, can avoid this kind of back and forth. Danger.js is a good way to handle the higher level concerns that cannot be addressed at the syntax level.
-
React PWA Performance Study Case
This tool is run in our CI pipeline for every PR and the result is shown in the Github PR (it uses Danger behind it).
web-vitals
-
Top 20 Frontend Interview Questions With Answers
Google Core Vitals now represent the most important metrics to focus on when it comes to technical SEO. Google Core Vitals are a set of standardized metrics that Google uses to evaluate the user experience offered by a web page and assign it a technical SEO grade. Several tools exist to measure and report technical SEO performance, but the most reliable is Google Lighthouse.
- Measure Web Performance with Web Vitals
-
The Sisyphean Quest for Web Performance
-https://www.patterns.dev/ -https://github.com/reactjs/rfcs/blob/main/text/0188-server-components.md -https://dev.to/this-is-learning/qwik-the-post-modern-framework-3c5o -https://dev.to/this-is-learning/astro-framework-169m -https://developers.google.com/web/updates/2019/02/rendering-on-the-web -https://web.dev/vitals/
-
Meet the new Core Web Vital: Interaction to Next Paint (INP) 🎨
Image source: https://web.dev/vitals/
- Optimisation des images pour des performances web : techniques et conseils
-
Interaction to Next Paint (INP)
You will be pleased to know that isn’t actually the case and it’s a suite of metrics instead known collectively as core web vitals https://web.dev/vitals/
-
Is Lighthouse a misleading performance tool?
Let's go back to 2020, this was when Google made a big change regarding their performance rating -- they introduced the Core Web Vitals. I want to discuss this timeframe because it was the last point where there is clear comparable data between the performance metric set (5 metrics) and the Core Web Vitals (3 metrics). The Core Web Vitals is a subset of the performance metric set.
-
What Next.js Has to Offer React Developers
Beyond elevating the user experience, another clear benefit of speeding up the rendering of a website is search engine optimization (SEO). Speed is so important to ranking well on search engines that it’s included in Google’s published description of what their indexers use to rank websites for performance, called Core Web Vitals.
-
Climate-friendly software: don't fight the wrong battle
This is something we won't ever be able to measure, as it depends on how people perceive the overall experience on their device, but it boils down to perceived performance. So by all means, optimize your mobile apps and web frontends, test on old devices and slow networks (even if only emulated), and monitor their real-user performance (e.g. through Web Vitals). As part of performance testing, have a look on electricity use, as it will both be directly associated with emissions to produce that electricity, and be perceptible by the user (battery drain). And don't forget to account for the app downloads as part of the overall perceived performance: light mobile apps that don't need to be updated every other day, frontend JS and CSS that can be cached and won't update several times a day either (defeating the cache).
What are some alternatives?
vscode-pull-request-github - GitHub Pull Requests for Visual Studio Code
Tailwind CSS - A utility-first CSS framework for rapid UI development.
lighthouse-ci - Automate running Lighthouse for every commit, viewing the changes, and preventing regressions
Cypress - Fast, easy and reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser.
statoscope - Statoscope is a toolkit to analyze and validate webpack bundle
TypeScript - TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
prcop - A Github action for linting Pull Requests.
jest - Delightful JavaScript Testing.
gitpod - The developer platform for on-demand cloud development environments to create software faster and more securely.
use-force-update - React Hook to force your function component to update
sveltekit-simple-image-gallery - Simple Svelte responsive image gallery: create a ribbon gallery, using Svelte dimension bindings to maintain the aspect ratio of all images.