danger-js
codeball-action
Our great sponsors
danger-js | codeball-action | |
---|---|---|
6 | 18 | |
5,161 | 286 | |
0.6% | 1.0% | |
8.2 | 0.0 | |
2 days ago | about 1 year ago | |
TypeScript | TypeScript | |
MIT License | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
danger-js
-
Enforcing ESLint rules: A guide to taming codebase chaos
Make sure to not accept any Pull Request with commented ESLint errors to ensure a continuous improvement of your codebase quality. Some tools can help you to automate this part of the review, such as Danger JS.
-
How We Started Managing BSA Delivery Processes on GitHub
commitlint & dangerjs. Linters that help maintain consistency in all user-provided information related to Git and GitHub (commits, branch names, PR titles, etc.).
- DangerJS – automate common code review chores
- PRcop – open-source Pull Request linter for Github Actions built with JS
-
How to deal with teammates forcing personal preference into code reviews and nit picking everything?
Does your team use any automatic code formatting or linting tools? E.g. for TypeScript or JavaScript, a combination of Prettier and ESLint, with a well understood and agreed-upon configuration, can avoid this kind of back and forth. Danger.js is a good way to handle the higher level concerns that cannot be addressed at the syntax level.
-
React PWA Performance Study Case
This tool is run in our CI pipeline for every PR and the result is shown in the Github PR (it uses Danger behind it).
codeball-action
-
Read the latest issue from Kuration featuring articles on IndieHackers, AWS, Google Bard, Stripe and much more.
I found this neat application that finds bugs in your Pull Requests and lets you ship faster and with higher confidence.
-
Elimination of programmers
Code authoring might be a bit too much to ask of current tools for now, but code review (example 1, example 2) seems much more feasible right now. If employed judiciously it's another effective analysis tool to automatically find bugs, automating a task that can be a tedious challenge for many programmers. A human reviewer might ultimately still need to be involved, but less intensely.
- Codeball – AI Code Review (via GitHub Actions)
- Codeball – Add AI Code Review to your repository
- Ask HN: GitHub Copilot but for Code Review
-
You are waiting for code review more than you should
Codeball is a new and ballsy attempt at taking automation further. It simulates the developer intuition and approves safe pull requests, saving teams time.
- Codeball: AI-Powered Code Review
- Codeball – AI Code Review
What are some alternatives?
vscode-pull-request-github - GitHub Pull Requests for Visual Studio Code
l4v - seL4 specification and proofs
lighthouse-ci - Automate running Lighthouse for every commit, viewing the changes, and preventing regressions
actions-gh-pages - GitHub Actions for GitHub Pages 🚀 Deploy static files and publish your site easily. Static-Site-Generators-friendly.
statoscope - Statoscope is a toolkit to analyze and validate webpack bundle
serverless-patterns - Serverless patterns. Learn more at the website: https://serverlessland.com/patterns.
prcop - A Github action for linting Pull Requests.
github-pages-deploy-action - 🚀 Automatically deploy your project to GitHub Pages using GitHub Actions. This action can be configured to push your production-ready code into any branch you'd like.
gitpod - The developer platform for on-demand cloud development environments to create software faster and more securely.
watermelon - 🍉 Open-Source Copilot For Code Review
use-force-update - React Hook to force your function component to update
web-performance-research - Research in Web Performance