cypress-realworld-app VS prettier

Cypress documentation

The full source code of the examples shown in this article can be found here. The example web app is based on the react-note-taking-app built on top of the T3 Stack. The Cypress tests and configuration are based on the best practices documented in the cypress-realworld-app.

I’d encourage you to look at https://docs.cypress.io

Cypress is a modern, automated testing suite. It's a fully open source testing framework based on JavaScript and is built with libraries like Mocha and Chai that support BDD and TDD assertion styles. Further, using Cypress will be easy if you’re familiar with writing tests in JavaScript.

https://github.com/cypress-io/cypress-realworld-app

It's mainly about showing Cypress (which is something like Selenium or Playwright or what have you) but integrates it into a real world example with commonly used tools and frameworks.

I think the Cypress documentation is absolutely great:

https://docs.cypress.io/

One of the better things about cypress are how they create so many how-to guides for a variety of scenarios. Take implementing Cypress into a CI runners, they have guides on how to effectively use it nearly everywhere:

https://docs.cypress.io/guides/continuous-integration/ci-pro...

GitHub: https://github.com/cypress-io/cypress-realworld-app

In addition, we have also prepared over 30+ examples of real-world tests against the Real World App. This application has been around for a couple of years now, but since it contains some rather advanced concepts and examples, much of it was beyond reach for people just getting started. To solve this problem we have written in-depth articles for every example which explains line by line what each test is doing.

Cypress.io is just a test runner, but it can be paired with Testomat.io, a test management system for automated tests. Let's see how Testomat.io can answer the questions risen above. We will use Cypress Realworld App as you might have guessed, this is a good example of a project with well-written Cypress tests.

From my point of view, Prettier doesn't work well for styling with utility classes. For a discussion see Prettier#7863 or Prettier#5948.

Prettier: An opinionated code formatter that enforces a consistent code style.

Automating code checks with static code analysis allows us to enforce code styling effectively. By integrating tools into our workflow, we can identify errors at an early stage, while coding instead of blocking us at the end. For instance, flake8 checks Python code for style and errors, eslint performs similar checks for JavaScript, and prettier automatically formats code to maintain consistency.

So anyways, I wanted to hook up Emacs with Astro support. For now, I've just been roughing it out there and running Prettier by itself and turning off save on format and auto-complete. It's been scary.

If you're a developer, you're surely familiar with Prettier and ESLint. With over 8 years of existence, they have established themselves as references in the JavaScript ecosystem.

prettier is used to format you text

No formatting inconsistencies: The committed code should follow the organization's code formatting standards(prettier or pretty-quick).

Let’s walk through the steps for a one-time setup to configure husky pre-commit and pre-push hooks, ESLint with code styles conventions, prettier code formatter, and lint-staged. Husky automatically runs a script on each commit or push. This is useful for linting files to enforce code styles that keeps the entire code base following conventions.

GitHub | Website

Prettier: An opinionated code formatter that enforces a consistent code style.