csswg-drafts VS JSS

For more background, and some detailed discussion of the opposite argument ("display: masonry" over "display:grid"+"grid-template-rows: masonry") see https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9041

The tracking issue: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8659

As noted there, okHSL/HSV keeps the perceptual uniformity by removing some peaks beyond the geometric limit of HSL/HSV, and it is unclear whether it is what users do expect or not.

The idea is that you should be able to set accent color via accent-color CSS property. It is discussed that there should be access to the color value of this property, e.g. via AccentColor or AccentColorText.

What do you mean by "official documentation"? The specification [1]? MDN [2]?

[1] https://drafts.csswg.org/

[2] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS

The former is not meant as a learning resource for new web devs and the latter usually has information about the "baseline" support ond browser compatibility tables.

The link corresponding to the actual submission title (“CSS WG resolved to officially work on native custom functions and mixins”):

https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9350#issuecomment...

> RESOLVED: Start ED of css-mixins for CSS Custom Functions and Mixins

Recently I was reading the Learn CSS the pedantic way book and the definition for inline boxes did not match the way that anonymous block boxes were generated when an inline-level element had a block-level element as its child. So I went looking elsewhere for a more appropriate definition for that case and found this issue on standards: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1477 It was really interesting to know that I was not the only one confused. My question was: Does the inline-box generated by the inline-level element contains the box generated by the block-level child or there wasn't an inline-box that was a parent of them all but there were 2 siblings inline-level boxes of the block-level box that were wrapped in another anonymous block boxes? Reading that issue I got to know the concept of fragments, which I did not know browsers had. But the issue seems to suggest that the box tree for this case should have the inline-box as being a parent of the block-box. Which led me to another question, in that case, if I apply a border to the parent inline-level element, shouldn't it apply to the overall box that is generated (it does not)? The answer is that borders between block-boxes and inline-level boxes should not intersect but that is really difficult to derive from reading the standards alone. Anyway it was headache-inducing trying to learn the box-model pedantically :)

With all the recent CSS improvements I still miss the possibility to have working transition to "height:auto". The issue [1] on csswg-drafts is the most upvoted one. At least we can now use css grid and track sizes transitions, but it's far from intuitive, transition for "height:auto" should just work.

[1]: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/626

Masonry isn’t ready to be shipped as there are still quite a few open spec issues [^1] that need to be resolved first.

[^1]: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3...

the irc log is here: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7542#issuecomment...

i had the same reaction, it seems like a very weird syntax. but after reading the discussion i get it: you're telling a form field to behave like a normal html element, instead of behaving like a form field.

Most websites those days are SPA applications that render on the front-side. There is also this trend of CSS in JavaScript also knowns as JSS that is debatable (makes everything overcomplicated), but in some specific cases, can be justified and very useful.

> why tf aren't we using JS for styling already

People are and have been for quite a while

https://cssinjs.org/

JSS

It is possible. At its most simple, you could just modify the style property on every element. That's not generally considered best practice, but there are a number of "CSS-in-JS" libraries which streamline the process. The typically generate dynamic CSS classes and apply them to your elements. A big one is JSS.

import React, { useState, useEffect } from "react"; import Amplify, { API, graphqlOperation } from "aws-amplify"; import { createBlog } from "./graphql/mutations"; import { listBlogs } from "./graphql/queries"; import awsExports from "./aws-exports"; import { ListBlogsQuery } from "./API"; Amplify.configure(awsExports); const initialState = { name: "", body: "" }; const App = () => { const [formState, setFormState] = useState(initialState); const [blogs, setBlogs] = useState(); useEffect(() => { fetchBlogs() }, []); const handleInputChange = (event: React.ChangeEvent) => { setFormState({ ...formState, [event.target.name]: event.target.value }); }; const fetchBlogs = async () => { try { const blogData = (await API.graphql(graphqlOperation(listBlogs))) as { data: ListBlogsQuery } setBlogs(blogData.data); } catch (err) { console.log("Error fetching blogs" + err); } }; const addBlog = async () => { try { if (!formState.name || !formState.body) return; const blog = { ...formState }; if (blogs) { await API.graphql(graphqlOperation(createBlog, { input: blog })); await fetchBlogs(); setFormState(initialState); } } catch (err) { console.log("error creating blog: ", err); } }; return (

Amplify Todos

Create Blog {blogs && blogs?.listBlogs?.items?.map((blog, index) => { return (

{blog?.name}

{blog?.body}

); })}

); }; const styles = { container: { width: 400, margin: "0 auto", display: "flex", //real weird issue: https://github.com/cssinjs/jss/issues/1344 flexDirection: "column" as "column", justifyContent: "center", padding: 20, }, todo: { marginBottom: 15 }, input: { border: "none", backgroundColor: "#ddd", marginBottom: 10, padding: 8, fontSize: 18, }, todoName: { fontSize: 20, fontWeight: "bold" }, todoDescription: { marginBottom: 0 }, button: { backgroundColor: "black", color: "white", outline: "none", fontSize: 18, padding: "12px 0px", }, }; export default App;

Material UI v5 brought some amazing updates, but switching from JSS to Emotion had an arguably nasty side-effect: it was no longer as straightforward to group your component styles in classes. Fortunately, a fantastic library emerged that allowed developers to not only reduce the extreme pain from migrating all their classes from v4's makeStyles to emotion, but to also to continue to writing classes in practically the same syntax, with wonderful TS type-safety. This library was tss-react, and it was one of my favorite open source discoveries of 2021.

I started writing a long response, but I want to add that a simple CRA + JSS + TS (named exports only) stack solves or abstracts away most of these issues.

JSS