cson VS groq-test-suite

Compare cson vs groq-test-suite and see what are their differences.

cson

CoffeeScript-Object-Notation. Same as JSON but for CoffeeScript objects. (by bevry)
Our great sponsors
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
cson groq-test-suite
1 1
1,334 10
0.1% -
5.7 5.0
4 months ago 26 days ago
CoffeeScript JavaScript
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later -
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

cson

Posts with mentions or reviews of cson. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-04-03.
  • The Norway Problem
    18 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 3 Apr 2021
    I prefer JSON over YAML because I spend more time confused and burned by the problems caused by it.

    I understand that people don't like directly use JSON because it's not very friendly: no comments, no multi-line string, etc.

    A great alternative IMHO is cson[0]. It's like JSON to JavaScript but for CoffeeScript (though nobody talks about it nowadays). It has indentation-based syntax, comments, and multiline string which usually don't need to escape. The advantage is it's close enough to JSON which is the canonical format that everybody can agree on nowadays. For YAML and TOML there are too many visual part-aways from JSON.

    Or just create a JSON variant that enables comments and the backtick multiline string from JavaScript.

    [0] https://github.com/bevry/cson

groq-test-suite

Posts with mentions or reviews of groq-test-suite. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-04-03.
  • The Norway Problem
    18 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 3 Apr 2021
    TOML also has a few restrictions, such as not supporting mixed-type arrays like [1, "hello", true], or arrays at the root of the data. JSON can represent any TOML value (as far as I know), but TOML cannot represent any JSON value.

    At my company we use YAML a lot for table-driven tests (e.g. [1]), and this not only means lots of nested arrays, but also having to represent pure data (i.e. the expected output of a test), which requires a format that supports encoding arbitrary data structures.

    [1] https://github.com/sanity-io/groq-test-suite/

What are some alternatives?

When comparing cson and groq-test-suite you can also consider the following projects:

jsonnet - Jsonnet - The data templating language

yamllint - A linter for YAML files.

strictyaml - Type-safe YAML parser and validator.

lua-patterns - Exposing Lua string patterns to Rust

ron - Rusty Object Notation

tao-data-js - TAO data JavaScript module

edn - Extensible Data Notation

cue - CUE has moved to https://github.com/cue-lang/cue

bip39 - BIP-39 tools using Node and implemented in Coffeescript

toml.io - Source Code for toml.io

jadelet - Pure and simple clientside templates