cross-project-council VS ipfs

Since then, Node.js is being governed by the OpenJS Foundation. Now, the project is in good hands having people like James Snell from Snyk, Michael Dawson from Red Hat, and Matteo Collina formerly from NearForm in its Technical Steering Committee - tirelessly driving success, assessing latest developments in the field, and keeping the legend of Ryan alive!

It provided a structured environment for collaboration, partnership, and feature prioritization. In 2019 it merged with the JS Foundation to become the even more powerful OpenJS Foundation.

Node also has a foundation https://openjsf.org/ that could do similar governance and centralization. There is even a process to bring something like a framework of libraries https://openjsf.org/projects/ to the community.

This guy should approach the OpenJS Foundation [0] (previously it was the JQuery Foundation). It's sponsored by the big guys. There are a few more Open Source Foundation.

Could be that successfully funded OS projects are being maintained/leaded by charismatic guys? Those that can do marketing and get the project known and eventually get fundings. e.g.: tailwind, jquery, vue, sveltekit

0: https://openjsf.org

Bu vaqt mobaynida esa TC39 deb nomlangan JSni stardartlashtirish guruhi bir qancha OpenJS Foundation kabi ochiq jamiyatlar yordamida ECMAScript 2015 yoki ES6 versiyasini ishlab chiqishdi va 2015 yilga kelibgina taqdim etishdi. Bu JS tarixidagi shu paytgacha kirtilgan eng katta va muhim yangilanish edi.

This certification is offered by the OpenJS Foundation, a leading foundation that supports the growth and governance of many NodeJS open source projects such as Node.js, Electron, jQuery, and Webpack.

Code of Conduct

> CDNs

If you think IPFS is trying to "re-spin CDNs as their invention", I'm pretty sure you misunderstand what IPFS. The homepage is a great starting point if you're curious rather than antagonistic: https://ipfs.tech/

> IPFS doesn't solve persistence of data

I don't think it claims to solve this either? What it does claim to solve is the persistence of identifiers of data.

> doesn't solve churn in p2p systems

What P2P system has ever done so or even claimed to have done so?

We will create a web app that will let users mint a NFT in one click: creating an AI art from a prompt, storing it on IPFS and mint the unique NFT in Polygon so you can see it on OpenSea. Pretty cool right ?

IPFS, which stands for Inter-Planetary File System, is a decentralized storage system where files are distributed among peers in a peer-to-peer (P2P) network. It operates on a "content addressable" model, meaning that each file is given a unique hash that serves as its identifier. By using this hash, you can retrieve any file from any IPFS node in the network.

Like this? https://ipfs.tech/

Was thinking of something and figured it would be a good opportunity to ask here. With the censorship madness going on in the world and furry community included, I often worry if even places like e621 can remain free and open in the face of increasing pressure by increasingly angry and authoritarian crowds. For both this and other geek reasons I've been interested in decentralized internet technology for a long time, following projects like IFPS which I just love as a concept.

Using the Interplanetary File System, a real thing that exists today, designed for this purpose.

I post a lot about IPFS, I was using the 'ipfs mount' to virtually offer my entire collection from my NAS (on a private 'swarm' of course) to the remote stations.