CouchDB VS foundation

CouchDB

CouchDB is a json based database for simple projects. The fork pouchdb offers lots of support for offline.

Apache CouchDB belongs to the family of NoSQL databases. It is a document store with a strong focus on replication and reliability. One of the most significant differences between CouchDB and a relational database (besides the absence of tables and schemas) is how you query data. Relational databases allow their users to execute arbitrary and dynamic queries via SQL. Each SQL query may look completely different than the previous one. These dynamic aspects are significant for use cases where you work exploratively with your dataset but don't matter as much in a web context. Additionally, defining an index for a specific table is optional. Most developers will define indices to boost performance, but the database does not require it.

I just turns out you can't always do that in a real codebase. For example see here:

  https://github.com/apache/couchdb/blob/23efd8e5b1aa96ef01640fec03a5fedc945ba8b9/src/couch_mrview/src/couch_mrview_http.erl#L228

Example: Apache Cassandra, CouchDB.

For non-SQL-based databases, consider MongoDB, or CouchDB, which are very easy to get started with.

The Apache CouchDB server. It stores Annotation data.

CouchDB

GraphQL is a query language and runtime for APIs. It provides a flexible and efficient way for clients to request and retrieve specific data from a server using a single API endpoint.

When you use technologies like GraphQL, it is trivial to derive TypeScript types. A GraphQL API is created by implementing a schema. Generating the TypeScript type definitions from this schema is simple, and you do not have to do any more work than just making the GraphQL API. This is one reason why I like GraphQL so much.

REST and GraphQL have advantages, drawbacks, and use cases for different environments. REST is for simple logic and a more structured architecture, while GraphQL is for a more tailored response and flexible request.

A Gatsby site uses Gatsby, which leverages React and GraphQL to create fast and optimized web experiences. Gatsby is often used for building static websites, progressive web apps (PWAs), and even full-blown dynamic web applications.

In my usual NodeJS tech stack, which includes GraphQL, NestJS, SQL (predominantly PostgreSQL with MikroORM), I encountered these limitations. To overcome them, I've developed a new stack utilizing Rust, which still offers some ease of development:

At Woovi we are GraphQL lovers, hence we develop many helpers around this tool to bring a good developer experience.

A query language for APIs that allows clients to request only the data they need. It provides a more flexible and efficient alternative to RESTful APIs. GraphQL provides a single endpoint for multiple data sources, making it efficient for clients to retrieve only the necessary information forexample if a Node.js microservice uses GraphQL, a client can send a query to request specific data, and the GraphQL service will fetch the required information from the underlying data sources and respond accordingly.

This approach is particularly beneficial for teams looking to enhance their digital presence without the need for extensive coding or software development. By leveraging the GraphQL API endpoint, developers can prepare and execute queries to retrieve the desired content. This makes the Headless Channel a valuable tool 🔨 for content managers and developers, offering ease of use and practicality.

To know about Graphql and why it's being used head over to for more details, Now let's cut to the chase.

GraphQL is an excellent choice for real-time data synchronization in React Native apps. By using GraphQL, you can retrieve precisely the data you need and receive updates in real-time, reducing network usage and providing a seamless user experience.