deepseq
| core-libraries-committee | deepseq | |
|---|---|---|
| 60 | 4 | |
| 95 | 39 | |
| - | - | |
| 5.3 | 5.1 | |
| 19 days ago | 1 day ago | |
| Haskell | ||
| - | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
core-libraries-committee
-
An alternative front end for Haskell?
> But the obvious and easy solution in the current language would be to return Maybe, which isn't done because there's a feeling that it's not a big enough step to be worth the effort, and dependent types will eventually solve this anyway.
That's not why it's not done. listToMaybe already exists[1] and you can't change the type of head without breaking everyone's code, so head in the next version of base will come with a warning[2] and that's about as much as you can do whilst still maintaining backwards compatibility.
[1] https://www.stackage.org/haddock/lts-21.14/base-4.17.2.0/Dat...
[2] https://github.com/haskell/core-libraries-committee/issues/8...
- Proposal: extend Data.Bitraversable API with firstA and secondA
-
Core Libraries Committee (CLC) Update: June 2023
The proposal to add quantified superclasses to Bifoldable and Bitraversable has been reopened too. https://github.com/haskell/core-libraries-committee/issues/93
-
Monthly Hask Anything (June 2023)
My understanding is any change to base requires an explicit proposal, and if it involves adding stuff to Data.List that could break other packages, that will be taken into account. But it's not a dealbreaker, e.g. a recent proposal to add Data.List.unsnoc got accepted.
- Proposal: add foldl' to Prelude
- プロポーザル: Data.List.unsnoc :: [a] -> Maybe ([a], a) を追加する
- Proposal: add Data.List.unsnoc :: [a] -> Maybe ([a], a)
- Proposal: add instance {Enum, Bounded, Num, Real, Integral} Compose f g a
-
The Haskell Unfolder Episode 2: quantified constraints
Bifunctor has one as well (issue)
- Proposal: expose sized integer types {Int,Word}{8,16,32,64} from Prelude
deepseq
- deepseq の NFData (a -> b) インスタンスを削除する議論がある
- deepseq: Removing instance NFData (a -> b) (for real this time)
-
Superclasses for Eq1 / Eq2 and relaxed instances for Compose
I opened an issue: https://github.com/haskell/deepseq/issues/88
-
Haskell - Important Libraries
deepseq
What are some alternatives?
unfolder - Repository with code snippets that accompany episodes of The Haskell Unfolder
deepseq-th - (Deprecated) Template Haskell deriver for NFData instances
ghc-proposals - Proposed compiler and language changes for GHC and GHC/Haskell
lens-tutorial - The missing tutorial module for the lens library
snake-fury - a challenge for Haskell beginners
deepseq-instances - Candidate NFData Instances for Types in base
errors - Type-safe error handling
deepseq-generics - GHC.Generics-based Control.DeepSeq.rnf implementation
conkin - Tools for functors from Hask^k to Hask
layers - Modular type class machinery for monad transformer stacks.
deepseq-magic - Deep evaluation of data structures without NFData
apart - Get all your structure and rip it apart.