conventional-changelog VS grype

Using Conventional Commits ⭐ as a standard for your commit messages, makes Semantic Versioning 🔖 as easy as can be, with tools like Conventional Changelog 📄 Standard Version 🔖 and Semantic Release 📦🚀

conventional-changelog-conventionalcommits is a package used for creating conventional commits and has a bit more configuration possibilities with changelogs in contrast to the default Angular commit scheme.

Finally, it is also interesting to be able to automatically generate the CHANGELOG file from the commit messages. There are various tools for this, one of them is Conventional Changelog

Some projects generate change logs automatically from commits. For example, angular uses conventional-changelog.

I'm under the understanding from this issue that in semver, a package that is <1.0.0 is considered unstable. This means that a breaking change can occur at any version, usually between minors.

conventional-changelog-conventionalcommits

[1] - https://github.com/conventional-changelog/conventional-chang...

I dont use myself, but some people follows something like the conventional commit spec, and then uses a generator.

Trivy Operator : A simple and comprehensive vulnerability scanner for containers and other artifacts. It detects vulnerabilities of OS packages (Alpine, Debian, CentOS, etc.) and application dependencies (pip, npm, yarn, composer, etc.) (Alternatives : Grype, Snyk, Clair, Anchore, Twistlock)

Besides pointing pentester tools like metasploit at yourself, there are some nice scanners out there.

https://github.com/quay/clair

https://github.com/anchore/grype/

Using Grype:

In the lab to follow, we'll see how vulnerability scanning can be conveniently achieved with Grype and how various systematic techniques can be applied to start securing our microservices at the container image level.

Scanning your container images for vulnerabilities is a good approach. But this scanning is not one time job, it should be done regularly (weekly, monthly, etc.) You need to follow vulnerability reports and fix all of the vulnerabilities as soon as possible. I recommend some open-source tools that could be useful: Trivy, Docker-Bench, Grype.

Grype is another popular open source tool from Anchore. Working with SBOM files, Grype scans container images and filesystems for vulnerabilities. Grype supports different output formats for vulnerabilities and custom templates for output.

Grype (https://github.com/anchore/grype)

Grype will allow you to scan a container to see if you have any vulnerable packages.

https://github.com/anchore/grype 5.6k stars, updated 3 days ago