composition-api VS vite

Composition API (now built-in): Composition API is a built-in feature of Vue 3 and is currently available to Vue 2 through the officially maintained @vue/composition-api plugin. In Vue 3, it's mainly used together with the syntax in single-report additives. Here is a basic instance of a issue using Composition API:

√ What would you like to build? » App with Quasar CLI, let's go! √ Project folder: ... quasar-qrcode-scanner √ Pick Quasar version: » Quasar v1 (Vue 2) √ Pick script type: » Typescript √ Package name: ... quasar-qrcode-scanner √ Project product name: (must start with letter if building mobile apps) ... Quasar QR Code Scanner √ Project description: ... A Quasar Project √ Author: ... √ Pick a Vue component style: » Composition API (recommended) (https://github.com/vuejs/composition-api) √ Pick your CSS preprocessor: » Sass with SCSS syntax √ Pick a Quasar components & directives import strategy: (can be changed later) » * Auto-import in-use Quasar components & directives - also treeshakes Quasar; minimum bundle size √ Check the features needed for your project: » ESLint √ Pick an ESLint preset: » Prettier

I'd just found out about this back port of the Composition API to Vue 2 (https://github.com/vuejs/composition-api). What's your experience with that? Is it stable enough to use in a production project with +1000 users? Or is more experimental?

While Vue 3 has had a paradigma change by switching to the Composition API as the primary API, you still can use the "old" Options API which stays mostly unchanged to Vue 2. And vice-versa Vue 2 actually supports most of the Composition API when you include an additional plugin: https://github.com/vuejs/composition-api

Is it even worth it to use https://github.com/vuejs/composition-api or should i migrate to vue 3. I'm only using vue 2 so i can use the vuetify calendar component.

Npm package: @vue/composition-api

If you can’t migrate to Vue 3 today, then you can still use the Composition API already. You can do this by installing the official Composition API Vue 2 Plugin.

I see that the @vue/composition-api also admits to having some performance overhead when used with Vue 2. And it appears to have quite a list of its own gotchas, judging from the README.

For what it's worth most of Vue 3's features can be backported to Vue 2 apps by including the @vue/composition-api package. I agree with the other comment, the v2 docs will get you very far.

As of this writing, initializing a Hattip project requires some manual commands. However, keep in mind that a zero-config development environment based on Vite is in the works.

import { defineConfig } from 'vite' import react from '@vitejs/plugin-react' // https://vitejs.dev/config/ export default defineConfig({ plugins: [react()], server: { port: 4200, } })

For the frontend of "I Disappear," I leverage the automated build & deploy system provided by Netlify, which seamlessly integrates with Vite. This setup ensures that every deployment is optimized for performance, utilizing Vite’s modern build tools to enhance speed and efficiency.

Given our team's collective proficiency within the React ecosystem, we decided to leverage this expertise for our project. Initially, we contemplated utilizing Next.js; however, due to the limited practical experience with this technology among key engineers and the pressing timeline to develop the first prototype, we opted for a Single Page Application(SPA) approach. For bundling, we selected Vite, primarily due to its super fast build times, simplicity of configuration, and potential for a nearly seamless transition to server-side rendering.

We are continuing to add new project templates for various types of projects, and we've recently created one for the infamous combination of React with Vite tooling.

Vite focuses on providing an extremely fast development server and workflow speed in web development. It uses its own ES module imports during development, speeding up the startup time.

Vite and Next.js are both top 5 modern development framework right now. They are both great depending on your use case so we’ll discuss 4 areas: Architecture, main features, developer experience and production readiness. After learning about these we’ll have a better idea of which one is best for your project.

import { defineConfig } from 'vite' import react from '@vitejs/plugin-react-swc' import path from 'path' // https://vitejs.dev/config/ export default defineConfig({ plugins: [react()], server: { port: 3000 }, css: { devSourcemap: true }, resolve: { alias: { '~': path.resolve(__dirname, './src') } } })

I am currently utilizing Vite:

Homepage: https://vitejs.dev/