coc-rust-analyzer VS tree-sitter

Rust

You can absolutely get nvim and rust analyzer working together. I personally use this: https://github.com/fannheyward/coc-rust-analyzer

nvim plugin](https://github.com/neoclide/coc.nvim) together with the rust analyzer plugin. It's given me the most complete, useful experience developing in rust on nvim. I absolutely love it and can't recommend it enough.

I use https://github.com/neoclide/coc.nvim with https://github.com/fannheyward/coc-rust-analyzer and this default config: https://github.com/ithinuel/dotfiles/blob/main/.config/nvim/coc-settings.json#L2-L9

If you're using coc-rust-analyzer, did you try setting rust-analyzer.inlayHints.enable to false?

Using this plugin I have installed several extensions like coc-clangd and coc-rust-analyzer .

It works pretty well with coc-rust-analyzer actually. but I eventually found the file tree in VSCode very useful, also the debugging interface, so I use VSCode with the Vim plugin. It is the best of both worlds how I feel.

I would install coc.nvim and https://github.com/fannheyward/coc-rust-analyzer

Yeah sorry I thought you were saying to use the rust-analyzer vim plugin.

VIM users too! It is available as a language server extension for CoC, called coc-rust-analyzer and it works just as well as the VSCode version.

I learned from a google search that these days upstream tree-sitter provides WebAssembly bindings.

Source: https://github.com/tree-sitter/tree-sitter/tree/master/lib/b...

NPM: https://www.npmjs.com/package/web-tree-sitter

Download from the latest Github release: js file (https://github.com/tree-sitter/tree-sitter/releases/download...) and wasm file (https://github.com/tree-sitter/tree-sitter/releases/download...)

Tree-sitter optimizes for performance (to use in editors), not for correctness. In fact even TS' core developers advocate for not bothering too much with correctness of grammars[1]. I imagine this constraint would be a deal-breaker for GitHub or anyone else in their position.

[1] https://github.com/tree-sitter/tree-sitter/issues/130#issuec...

This is a plugin that provides a simple way to use the tree-sitter in Neovim and also provides functionalities like highlighting, etc.

From the tree-sitter side, I am tracking https://github.com/tree-sitter/tree-sitter/issues/1942

Is tree-sitter really slower than TextMate grammars? Some benchmarks indicate that this isn't really the case [1]. On the other hand, breaking parse trees is a real issue, because the error-recovery in tree-sitter is pretty rudimentary [2][3], but as you said, it's not an issue for Shiki.

Several TextMate grammars suffer from inaccuracy bugs, and issues of maintainability. Perhaps the biggest hindrance in the adoption of tree-sitter, is that the most popular editor, VSCode, still doesn't support it.

[1]: https://github.com/microsoft/vscode/pull/161479

[2]: https://github.com/tree-sitter/tree-sitter/issues/1870

[3]: https://github.com/tree-sitter/tree-sitter/issues/224

u/lewis6991 I think the biggest performance gain was made by tree-sitter itself: https://github.com/tree-sitter/tree-sitter/pull/2085

I asked on the repo's discussions but responses are limited and not explanatory (I'm not shaming anyone here, discussions aren't a place for detailed how-tos and documentations anyway).

The following discussion here. TS query cannot be incremental, that is why I regard it as design fault.

Hi, so I've recently decided to give Neovim yet another try, this time using some predefined plugins with kickstart.nvim, for syntax it uses tree-sitter.