cloneable VS home

I just mirrored every one of the following projects using my little utility cloneable.

I use it to backup all if my github repositories and update them in parallel.

From a server perspective, you make all user writable space noexec but that’s not very practical for desktop. I also configure a firewall with inbound and outbound rules, but that’s a bit more advanced than configuring fstab for new users. Although, I’m an admin I don’t like posting in admin subreddits.

github_wait_actions.sh

Reading the man page will blow your mind. You can make a bash e-book for easier reading outside of the terminal like a tablet.

Jenkins infrastructure relies on AWS features. It's uptime is maintained by an autoscaling group. The active half (say blue) sets desired capacity of green to 1 and follows up by setting its own ASG to desired capacity 0. AWS takes over from that point. Green waits for the volume to become available and if the volume is blue it takes a snapshot and waits for the snapshot to complete. After the snapshot completes it updates the AWS tag of the data volume from blue to green. Then, it hands off to this attach volume script. The script attaches, mounts the volume and sets up /etc/fstab in case of a reboot. After the storage is available then systemctl start jenkins.service is called.

Hmm, I'm using EBS as well. I use a script on the autoscaling EC2 instance which attaches EBS before starting Nexus.

On boot, EBS store is auto mounted and pulls secrets from secrets manager.

Functions take compound commands. People treat bash like other programming languages but it is more powerful at specific things. Functions can take more than {} which is unlike other programming languages.