cl-parametric-types VS dense-numericals

Compare cl-parametric-types vs dense-numericals and see what are their differences.

cl-parametric-types

(BETA) C++-style templates for Common Lisp (by cosmos72)

dense-numericals

Numerical Computing library with https://github.com/digikar99/dense-arrays as the front-end (by digikar99)
InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
cl-parametric-types dense-numericals
1 2
43 0
- -
0.0 0.0
almost 6 years ago almost 3 years ago
Common Lisp Common Lisp
- -
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

cl-parametric-types

Posts with mentions or reviews of cl-parametric-types. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-05-21.

dense-numericals

Posts with mentions or reviews of dense-numericals. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-05-21.
  • polymorphic-functions - Possibly AOT dispatch on argument types with support for optional and keyword argument dispatch
    9 projects | /r/lisp | 21 May 2021
    An example where this has been put to use is at dense-numericals - so, we have the one-arg-fn as the basic polymorph that actually does the dispatching. But since the remaining polymorphs (sin, cos, tan, etc; the ones in the macrolet) are what I'll call parametric, by simply defining these for type t, these are defined for anything that the one-arg-fn is defined for, thus enabling both optimal compilation without dispatch overheads, as well as no compiled code repetition; without this, one would have required about 7 polymorphs for each of the 14 or so functions in this file.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing cl-parametric-types and dense-numericals you can also consider the following projects:

cffi - The Common Foreign Function Interface

numericals - CFFI enabled SIMD powered simple-math numerical operations on arrays for Common Lisp [still experimental]

specialization-store - A different type of generic function for common lisp.

dense-arrays - Numpy like array object for common lisp

polymorphic-functions - A function type to dispatch on types instead of classes with partial support for dispatching on optional and keyword argument types.