ccl | Vim | |
---|---|---|
18 | 52 | |
817 | 13,299 | |
1.8% | 1.1% | |
7.7 | 9.4 | |
5 days ago | 3 days ago | |
Common Lisp | TypeScript | |
Apache License 2.0 | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
ccl
-
Don't Invent XML Languages (2006)
There's plenty of history of s-expression formats for documentation. One example is: https://github.com/Clozure/ccl/tree/master/doc/manual
But, also, there's plenty of uses of XML that are not "artcles and books". For example, Maven's pom.xml and log4j2.xml.
-
The IDEs we had 30 years ago and we lost
The descendant of CCL runs on modern Intel Macs. (It also runs on Linux and Windows but without the IDE.) The modern IDE is quite a bit different from the original. In particular, it no longer has the interface builder. But it's still pretty good. It is now called Clozure Common Lisp (so the acronym is still CCL) and you can find it here:
https://ccl.clozure.com/
If you want to run the original that is a bit of a challenge, but still possible. The original was never ported directly to OS X so you have to run it either on old hardware or an emulator running some version of the original MacOS, or on an older Mac running Rosetta 1. In the latter case you will want to look for something called RMCL. Also be aware that Coral Common Lisp was renamed Macintosh Common Lisp (i.e. MCL) before it became Clozure Common Lisp (CCL again).
This looks like it might be a promising place to start:
https://github.com/binghe/mcl
If you need more help try this mailing list:
https://lists.clozure.com/mailman/listinfo/openmcl-devel
- The Saga of the Closure Compiler, and Why TypeScript Won
-
Clozure CL 1.12.2
Download: https://github.com/Clozure/ccl/releases/tag/v1.12.2
-
plain-common-lisp: a lightweight framework created to make it easier for software developers to develop and distribute Common Lisp applications on Microsoft Windows
I was not aware that UIOP provided that function. plain-common-lisp used to be implemented with Clozure CL but eventually moved to SBCL due to the lack of maintenance of CCL. But now there is a hard dependency on SBCL.
- Clozure Common Lisp Wiki
-
Consuming HTTP endpoint using Common Lisp
I have decided it is time to have some fun and use Common Lisp to create algorithm representation that deals with parallel execution. For this I decided to use Clozure common lisp, put basic Qucklisp there and load some libraries to do this.
-
The Origins of Lisp
Lisp must be read outside->in to understand what it is saying. Given (foo (a) (b c)), if you don't know what foo is and just start reading (b c), which is inside, hoping that later you can work out what is foo, you could be going down a blind alley. foo could be a macro or special operator which entirely controls what (b c) means.
To understand what is calculated in Lisp, given that you understand what the syntax means, the evaluation is inside->out.
That's no different from math. In any languages that have math-like nested expressions with bracketing, you have inside-out evaluation.
The alternative are catenative languages and such, which have never been mainstream.
There are assembly languages which go line by line.
Imperative languages with statements and expressions tend to have small expressions where evaluation is followed inside-out; the rest of the control flow is just top down, with some forward and backward skips.
Lisp has all of the above in it. Lisp can be assembly language. For instance, in thsi source file from Clozure Common Lisp:
https://github.com/Clozure/ccl/blob/master/level-0/ARM/arm-h...
(defarmlapfunction fast-mod-3 ((number arg_x) (divisor arg_y) (recip arg_z))
- Corman Lisp development environment for MS Windows
Vim
- The IDEs we had 30 years ago and we lost
- The Loneliness of the Mid-Level Vimmer
-
Multiple Notepad++ Flaws Let Attackers Execute Arbitrary Code
I find the Vim extension for VS Code has macro support that is good enough for most of my use cases (if you’re a fan of Vim key bindings - obviously).
https://github.com/VSCodeVim/Vim/blob/master/ROADMAP.md#repe...
-
VSCode with Neovim?
that's why I just use https://github.com/VSCodeVim/Vim if I have to use VSCode
-
Can i change a with i and vice versa in command mode.
They have discussions enabled on the GitHub repository; eventually r/vscode might be of help.
-
Neovim vs VSCode Neovim - what are the tradeoffs?
What you would learn from using a neovim addon for VS Code covers most of the first point and some of the second - VSCode Vim lets you run neovim in a headless mode that relays keypresses to it, and emulates several popular addons. It also comes without quite as much hassle as comes from the second step of learning to configure vim/neovim yourself. Most VSCode extensions work pretty well out of the box, maybe requiring you to add the path to a compiler/interpreter that is not on your PATH.
-
Vim extension for VS Code lacks "virtualedit" option and cursor doesn't reach the end
The extension does have visualedit. You can check the list of supported features here: https://github.com/VSCodeVim/Vim/blob/HEAD/ROADMAP.md
-
How to achieve VSCode's vim like jsx and imports folding in doom emacs
I though VSCode's vim emulation had issues with code folding
-
I'm stuck between CB-GK-16 and 617, I like 617 more cause it looks better. Now the situation is I'm a programmer, I don't mind learning new bindings but is it worth it? If you have any experiences that would help me, please share them with me :)
Either I go with K552 or save for RK84 if not CB-GK-16 and both of these are pretty good choice that's certain, or I go with 617 Fizz and use VIM keybinding which Isn't an issue for me cause I've been using NeoVim for more than 1 year, you can grab my dotfiles if you want. Most people won't go with 60% cause they are used to arrow, home, end ... keys so am I with vs code but today I found out about vscodevim extension which enables vim keybinding , these keybindings pretty easy to use more than arrow, home, end .. keys if yo're a vim user like Shift + $ = end, Shift + 0 = home, in visual mode V to select text etc ...
- Undo (“u”) stopped working as intend – Issue #8157 – VSCodeVim/Vim
What are some alternatives?
sbcl - Mirror of Steel Bank Common Lisp (SBCL)'s official repository
vscode-live-server - Launch a development local Server with live reload feature for static & dynamic pages.
sketch - A Common Lisp framework for the creation of electronic art, visual design, game prototyping, game making, computer graphics, exploration of human-computer interaction, and more.
vscode-neovim - Vim mode for VSCode, powered by Neovim
lisp-interface-library - LIL: abstract interfaces and supporting concrete data-structures in Common Lisp
NvChad - Blazing fast Neovim config providing solid defaults and a beautiful UI, enhancing your neovim experience.
data-lens - Functional utilities for Common Lisp
SpaceVim - A community-driven modular vim/neovim distribution - The ultimate vimrc
plain-common-lisp - A trivial way to get a native Common Lisp environment on Windows
vimrc - The ultimate Vim configuration (vimrc)
land-of-lisp-using-hunchentoot - Convert code for "Dice of Doom" from Barski's "Land of Lisp" to use Hunchentoot web server.
coc-java - Java extension for coc.nvim