catln
A high-level programming language (by zachgk)
hope
Hope programming language interpreter (by dmbaturin)
| catln | hope | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 34 | 36 | |
| - | - | |
| 9.1 | 0.0 | |
| 3 months ago | almost 4 years ago | |
| Haskell | C | |
| MIT License | GNU General Public License v3.0 only |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
catln
Posts with mentions or reviews of catln.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-02-05.
-
How to implement term rewriting systems?
Finally, how to compile into machine code. I mostly talked about how I handled it earlier with respect to the tree building IR. At that point, you have already resolved all the weirdness from the term rewriting and you just compile it like any normal language. I just go to LLVM and it's fairly straightforward. If you are interested in any other details, the full language is documented here and on GitHub.
hope
Posts with mentions or reviews of hope.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-02-05.
-
How to implement term rewriting systems?
Hope someone else has a better answer.
-
Functors and Monads For People Who Have Read Too Many "Tutorials"
Let's remember what the point of Haskell is: to be a unified language for research in lazy functional programming, as opposed to having to pick one of half a dozen mutually incompatible lazy functional languages used in research before, the most popular examples being Hope and Miranda. In other words, you should think of Haskell as the Common Lisp of lazy functional programming.
What are some alternatives?
When comparing catln and hope you can also consider the following projects:
fp-ts - Functional programming in TypeScript
promises-spec - An open standard for sound, interoperable JavaScript promises—by implementers, for implementers.