catamorphism
ghci-ng
| catamorphism | ghci-ng | |
|---|---|---|
| - | 1 | |
| 28 | 1,043 | |
| - | - | |
| 0.0 | 0.4 | |
| about 6 years ago | - | |
| Haskell | Haskell | |
| BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License | BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
catamorphism
We haven't tracked posts mentioning catamorphism yet.
Tracking mentions began in Dec 2020.
ghci-ng
-
Why Clojure?
I've only dabbled with GHCI. I've used it as a standalone REPL for trying out small things, the same way I'd use a Python or Javascript REPL. I haven't used the REPL /the/ developer interface to the program. In Clojure, I would (1) start a REPL server, (2) connect to it from my editor, and (3) send expressions to it. I didn't develop Haskell that way, though I think it was possible with Intero[1].
Within the Clojure community, there's a perception that the Clojure REPL is one of its strongest selling points[2].
Are you using the REPL actively when developing?
[1]: https://github.com/chrisdone/intero#readme
What are some alternatives?
stgi - A user-centric visual STG implementation to help understand GHC/Haskell's execution model.
leksah - Haskell IDE
ormolu - A formatter for Haskell source code
ghcid - Very low feature GHCi based IDE
lit - A modern tool for literate programming
ghc-mod
git-gpush
ghci-ng
hpack - hpack: A modern format for Haskell packages
hdocs - Haskell docs tool
ShellCheck - ShellCheck, a static analysis tool for shell scripts
hoogle - Haskell API search engine