catai VS alpaca-lora

The easiest tool I found is CatAI: https://github.com/ido-pluto/catai You just type 3 npm commands and THATS IT! You have your own Chat Web UI on your computer without hundrets of settings

I am a noob. I saw your comment on github and another post here. I am confused about what has changed and what us users have to do. Do we have to update llama.cpp and redownload all the models(I am using something called catai instead of the webui, i think it also uses llama.cpp)? How do we know which versions of the models are compatible with which vesions of llama.cpp?

https://github.com/ggerganov/llama.cpp https://github.com/oobabooga/text-generation-webui https://github.com/mlc-ai/mlc-llm https://github.com/cocktailpeanut/dalai https://github.com/ido-pluto/catai (this is super easy to install but it doesnt provide an api or have integration with langchain)

Pretty simple using catai.

You can check out the original GitHub project here

Here is a example: https://github.com/tloen/alpaca-lora/blob/main/finetune.py

In this blog post, I want to make it as simple as possible to fine-tune the LLaMA 2 - 7B model, using as little code as possible. We will be using the Alpaca Lora Training script, which automates the process of fine-tuning the model and for GPU we will be using Beam.

Implement the code in Llama LoRA repo in a script we can run locally

Hi all - relatively new to GitHub / programming in general, and I wanted to try to set up Alpaca Lora locally. Following the guide here: https://github.com/tloen/alpaca-lora

Follow up the popular work of u/tloen alpaca-lora, I wrapped the setup of alpaca_lora_4bit to add support for GPTQ training in form of installable pip packages. You can perform training and inference with multiple quantizations method to compare the results.

If instead you want to apply a LoRa to a pytorch model, a lot of people use this script to apply to LoRa to the 16 bit model and then quantize it with a GPTQ program afterwards https://github.com/tloen/alpaca-lora/blob/main/export_hf_checkpoint.py

There are a few papers on watermarking LLM output, but from what I have seen they all use complex methods of detection to allow the watermark to go unseen by the end user, only to be detected by algorithm. I believe that a more overt system of watermarking might also be beneficial. One simple method that I have tried is character substitution. For this model, I LORA finetuned openlm-research/open_llama_3b on the alpaca_data_cleaned_archive.json dataset from https://github.com/tloen/alpaca-lora/ modified by replacing all instances of the "." character in the outputs with a "ι" The results are pretty good, with the correct the correct substitutions being generated by the model in most cases. It doesn't always work, but this was only a LORA training and for two epochs of 400 steps each, and 100% substitution isn't really required.

I am kind of new to finetuning LLM's and am not able to understand what this option exactly refers to. I guess it has the same meaning as the "train_on_inputs" parameter of alpacalora though.

Read the paper and also: https://github.com/tloen/alpaca-lora