castle
hoogle
Our great sponsors
| castle | hoogle | |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 51 | |
| 5 | 656 | |
| - | - | |
| 0.0 | 4.3 | |
| over 2 years ago | 3 months ago | |
| Haskell | Haskell | |
| Apache License 2.0 | BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
castle
We haven't tracked posts mentioning castle yet.
Tracking mentions began in Dec 2020.
hoogle
-
Idris: A Language for Type-Driven Development
You had a look at Hoogle?
For some type signatures there is (are) only one (or only a few) meaningful implementation(s).
-
Haskell is the one of the most hardest code
I'm in the middle on operators. I like being able to define my own, but I understand how it's challenging to figure out what the hieroglyphics mean when you're not familiar with them. https://hoogle.haskell.org/ can be a help here
-
What’s so great about functional programming anyway?
> In something like Haskell I need to know upfront what I may do with some "object". The IDE can't help me discover the methods I need. All it can do is to show me all available functions in scope.
Sorry, but this just isn't true. Hoogle <https://hoogle.haskell.org/> searches function by type, fuzzily: ask for functions whose first parameter is the type of the object-like thing, and you'll get just what you're looking for. And it's perfectly possible to run hoogle locally and integrate it with your editor.
Now, the tooling for a language like Java have had several centuries more of aggregate development work done on them compared to Haskell's tools, and if that polish is a difference-maker for you, that's fine! But it's not a fundamental limitation, and claiming it is is just fud.
-
Type-Signature.com
In my perusals into the Haskell ecosystem, discovering Hoogle[1] was definitely a revelation on the power of a strongly-typed language. Sometimes, you know the _shape_ of the thing you are looking for, but not the name. The ability to search a repository of packages for all functions conforming to a certain type signature (e.g., (a -> Bool) -> [a] -> [a]) is a superpower.
which is quite a bit more readable. You can even search Hoogle for x -> HashMap x y -> y and find it, try it!
https://hoogle.haskell.org/?hoogle=x%20-%3E%20HashMap%20x%20...
-
What Operators Do You WISH Programming Languages Had? [Discussion]
Haskell has hoogle, which searches Hackage for functions matching names, type signatures, etc.
-
Is there a website like haskell's Hoogle for rust?
Hello, I am wondering if there is something like https://hoogle.haskell.org for the rust language.
- My first Haskell program: Converts distfix precedence grammars to unambiguous context-free grammars.
-
What's the story with organizing a cental python docs hub?
So I was working on this tool pysearch.com for doing deep semantic searches of python docs by program analysis inferred functionality when I noticed that every library's docs seem to be in a different format hosted in a different source. This would be fine if there was also a standard format hub for all the libraries on pypi or something, but it looks like even readthedocs doesn't contain everything. I find this a bit odd given the existence of tools like pydoc for doing something like this locally. Originally, I was hoping to find something like hackage for haskell, as I was hoping to build a natural language version of hoogle. In the meantime I've gotten pysearch to work by setting up custom rules for each doc, but this is kinda unsustainable.
-
Lenses in Haskell
Point of clarification for readers who aren’t familiar with Haskell:
Haskell doesn’t have operators in the classic sense, since they’re just an alternate syntax (infix) for regular functions; implemented in libraries. The Haskell ecosystem OTOH has a shitton of infix functions, as does Edward Kmett’s lens library. I don’t think there’s any reason to bother memorizing the ones that aren’t useful to you. You can always search them on Hoogle if you encounter one you don’t know. E.g. https://hoogle.haskell.org/?hoogle=%28%5E.%29&scope=set%3Ast...
I use lenses frequently in a large application and have only ever used view, set, and over.
What are some alternatives?
stack - The Haskell Tool Stack
ihaskell - A Haskell kernel for the Jupyter project.
hakyll - A static website compiler library in Haskell
Exercism - Scala Exercises - Crowd-sourced code mentorship. Practice having thoughtful conversations about code.
merlin - Context sensitive completion for OCaml in Vim and Emacs
elm-make
ghci-ng
stgi - A user-centric visual STG implementation to help understand GHC/Haskell's execution model.
BigPixel - Pixel art for games
ghcid - Very low feature GHCi based IDE
gipeda - Git Performance Dashboard
fay - A proper subset of Haskell that compiles to JavaScript