Apache Cassandra VS Spring

Apache Cassandra

Apache Cassandra{:target="_blank"} is a highly scalable and fault-tolerant database that can handle large volumes of data across multiple nodes or clusters. It provides fast read and write operations, making it suitable for real-time analytics or applications with high throughput requirements.

Wide Column: Apache Cassandra, ScyllaDB and DynamoDB

Cassandra, a replicated, fault-tolerant, decentralized and scalable database system.

A popular database you might already be familiar with is Apache Cassandra®, which powers high-performing applications for thousands of companies including Hulu, Netflix, Spotify, and Apple. While this free, open-source database is known for its high availability, scalability, and resilience; the downside is that it’s also notoriously complex to set up and manage.

In our previous article, we looked at augmenting our dashboard to store and display individual events from the Avengers using DataStax Astra, a serverless DBaaS powered by Apache Cassandra using Stargate to offer additional APIs for working with it.

Example: Apache Cassandra, CouchDB.

For our TikTok database, we’re using DataStax Astra DB: a cloud-based database that fully manages Apache Cassandra®, one of the most robust and scalable NoSQL databases around.

1. Spring Framework The Spring Framework is a popular Java framework used for building enterprise-level applications. This repository contains the source code for the framework and related projects such as Spring Boot and Spring Security. https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework

This interface is a simplified version of real caching abstractions from Java technologies such as the ones from Spring or JCache (JSR-107). Both are part of quite complex solutions, having more generic types and different capabilities. Also, annotations would be preferred to using Cache directly in most Java applications.

Cross-post: Controller code using Unconfined Dispatcher #32032

Mitre really lost a lot of respect with CVE-2016-1000027. Every few weeks a warning that any SpringBoot 2.x project has a CVSS 9.8, which causes all sorts of heartache for those of us bound to CVE remediation. Every blasted security tool reports this one. Spring reviewed and rejected, as did our very, very large organization. Comically, this has become the CVE we use to see how our tools allow us to white/black list entries.

Thank god Spring dropped this interface in the Framework 6.x / Boot 3.x release, and the end for non-commercial support is this year for the old stuff.

https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/2...

Referring to https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/blob/main/spring-web/src/main/java/org/springframework/web/bind/annotation/GetMapping.java, the value could have got assigned to any of the other members like name, path, params, etc. Is there any logic involved that enables the single value passed to the GetMapping annotation to be assigned to the value member?

This one. In short, JMS listeners stopped working randomly (of course only on Saturdays, and only under load), but at first we didn't know that and suspected the message broker at fault. We had quite extensive logging, but no observability on the broker. Can't remember all the details, but eventually we figured out it was the listener container, and I could reproduce it after debugging deeply into Spring code during a load test.

GitHub Stars: 51 K GitHub Link: https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework

It still has, but it is more of "imaginary" one (https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/24434).