cardano-ledger VS CIPs

The actual code implementing it is a little hard to find (as always with the quite convoluted and scarcely documented Haskell sources of IOG). I'd suspect it to be somewhere in https://github.com/input-output-hk/cardano-ledger/tree/master/eras.

That's just rubbish, you can stop trying to create a false narrative now. Minpoolcost was in the Shelley design spec and deliverables, it's not something **evil Charles** come up with because he felt like it.

See for yourselves all the commits in the source repo for the implementation, it is sooo active: https://github.com/input-output-hk/cardano-ledger/commits/master

The formula for the mid-ada-value can be found here. Which is essentially:

Blockchain - I find it's one of the few fields really investing in formal methods at the moment (my old boss recently opened a research center at Carnegie Mellon in formalizing maths actually). Two repos with specs are:

* https://github.com/input-output-hk/cardano-ledger

This is a helpful article! : https://github.com/input-output-hk/cardano-ledger/blob/master/doc/explanations/features.rst I am invested in both the ERC20 and the native token. However, there’s greater demand currently for the ERC20 tokens.

> There are more downsides than that. The eUTxO model is not equivalent to accounts when it comes to its capabilities for building dApps.

> I explained it in more detail recently in a problem statement document for Cardano: https://github.com/cardano-foundation/CIPs/pull/874

I think I'm siding with Michele in this situation that what you describe as a problem is rather just a UX painpoint of UTXO and not a flaw or issue that needs to be fundamentally changed.

If you want to be able to coordinate to construct transactions you need to do it off-chain. The network can have standard systems for doing that or for verifying content (ex: DA-ed data that doesn't commit to L1) but any transactions that are settling on chain need to be 100% deterministic.

CPS-???? | Governance Security [New Problem]: This problem statement describes security issues to be considered by protocol governance CIPs.

The Lace team is already working with the community on how to find the best way to develop the CIP-72 - DApp Registration & Discovery. If you’re interested in taking part, contribute here

All mobile wallets have some kind of dApp browser, but there are no hard specs for how they should be run that is implemented at the moment. You might be interested in CIP72 if you're interested in standards for this topic more generally: https://github.com/cardano-foundation/CIPs/pull/355

CIP-???? | Extend token metadata for translations [New Proposal]: This proposal defines an addition to CIP-25 | Media NFT Metadata Standard to support more languages than English.

If you wish to add your perspectives to CIP 1694, make sure to share them here. Add your voice as the era of Voltaire rolls out!

Last week, a community-led roundtable took place on the topic of CIP-1694. You can catch the recap and outcome in last week’s newsletter or this Cardano Forum recap here. Worth a read.

Conditions inside a native script (but there is a CIP for changing this here)