cache
Tailwind CSS
cache | Tailwind CSS | |
---|---|---|
40 | 1,281 | |
4,264 | 78,568 | |
1.5% | 1.0% | |
7.2 | 9.4 | |
7 days ago | 1 day ago | |
TypeScript | TypeScript | |
MIT License | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
cache
-
GitHub Actions could be so much better
> with no persistent storage
There's https://github.com/actions/cache though?
-
Optimizing GitHub Actions Performance: Enhance Workflows with Caching
Use Cache Actions: GitHub Actions provides cache actions that simplify caching implementation. The @actions/cache JavaScript library is a popular choice for managing caching in workflows. It offers flexible options for storing and retrieving cache artifacts based on keys, scopes, and paths.
-
Speeding up GitHub Actions with npm cache
GitHub maintain a set of repos called actions. One of which is called cache.
-
How I Sliced Deployment Times to a Fraction and Achieved Lightning-Fast Deployments with GitHub Actions
By utilizing the actions/cache action action, we implemented a strategy to store and retrieve dependencies, preventing redundant installations.
-
Use GitHub Actions to Make Your GitHub Profile Dynamic
I do think it's good practice to enable caching, such that your script doesn't hit RubyGems / pip / npm / etc every time it runs.
That way at least the automation activity stays entirely within the GitHub / Azure network.
It looks like you can do that for Ruby by adding this:
https://github.com/actions/cache/blob/master/examples.md#rub...
- uses: ruby/setup-ruby@v1
-
A guide to using act with GitHub Actions
β getting-started-with-act git:(master) act -j build WARN β You are using Apple M1 chip and you have not specified container architecture, you might encounter issues while running act. If so, try running it with '--container-architecture linux/amd64'. β [Node.js CI/build] π Start image=node:16-buster-slim [Node.js CI/build] π³ docker pull image=node:16-buster-slim platform= username= forcePull=false [Node.js CI/build] π³ docker create image=node:16-buster-slim platform= entrypoint=["tail" "-f" "/dev/null"] cmd=[] [Node.js CI/build] π³ docker run image=node:16-buster-slim platform= entrypoint=["tail" "-f" "/dev/null"] cmd=[] [Node.js CI/build] β git clone 'https://github.com/actions/setup-node' # ref=v3 [Node.js CI/build] β git clone 'https://github.com/actions/cache' # ref=v3 [Node.js CI/build] β git clone 'https://github.com/actions/upload-artifact' # ref=v3 [Node.js CI/build] β Run Main actions/checkout@v3 [Node.js CI/build] π³ docker cp src=/Users/andrewevans/Documents/projects/getting-started-with-act/. dst=/Users/andrewevans/Documents/projects/getting-started-with-act [Node.js CI/build] β Success - Main actions/checkout@v3 [Node.js CI/build] β Run Main Use Node.js 16.x [Node.js CI/build] π³ docker cp src=/Users/andrewevans/.cache/act/actions-setup-node@v3/ dst=/var/run/act/actions/actions-setup-node@v3/ [Node.js CI/build] π³ docker exec cmd=[node /var/run/act/actions/actions-setup-node@v3/dist/setup/index.js] user= workdir= [Node.js CI/build] π¬ ::debug::isExplicit: [Node.js CI/build] π¬ ::debug::explicit? false
- duplicated cache by cache action
-
runner image with MS office installed - do-able? is there a better way?
You could try to find some point in the process where you can set up Actions caches with actions/cache, otherwise Container customization for Self-Hosted Runners is currently in Beta.
-
[Question] Decrease Docker image's build time
I would configure Github Actions cache so Docker doesn't have to compile all layers from scratch every time
-
The strongest principle of the blog's growth lies in the human choice to deploy it
In the copied example, npm caching is done via actions/cache@v2 action. But we can simplify our workflow by dropping this step and using built-in functionality for caching
Tailwind CSS
-
How to Build Your Own ChatGPT Clone Using React & AWS Bedrock
Finally, for our front end, weβre going to be pairing Next.js with the great combination of TailwindCSS and shadcn/ui so we can focus on building the functionality of the app and let them handle making it look awesome!
-
Building an Email Assistant Application with Burr
You can use any frontend framework you want β react-based tooling, however, has a natural advantage as it models everything as a function of state, which can map 1:1 with the concept in Burr. In the demo app we use react, react-query, and tailwind, but weβll be skipping over this largely (it is not central to the purpose of the post).
-
Shared Data-Layer Setup For Micro Frontend Application with Nx Workspace
Tailwind CSS: A utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom designs.
-
Preline UI + Gowebly CLI = β€οΈ
First, you need to make sure that you have a working Tailwind CSS projectβ¦
-
Customer service pages for e-commerce built with Tailwind CSS
Tailwind CSS
-
The best testing strategies for frontends
With better CSS approaches like TailwindCSS and Vanilla Extract (which we're heavily using) it's much easier to maintain the UI and make sure it doesn't change unexpectedly. No more conflicting CSS classes, much less CSS specificity issues and much less CSS code in general.
-
ChatCrafters - Chat with AI powered personas
This app was built with Svelte Kit, Tailwind CSS, and many other technologies. For a full rundown, please visit the GitHub repository
-
Mojo CSS vs. Tailwind: Choosing the best CSS framework
Unlike Tailwind, which has over 77,000 stars on GitHub, Mojo CSS has about 200 stars on GitHub. But the Mojo CSS documentation is fairly good and you can find most of the information youβll need there.
-
Collab Lab #66 Recap
JavaScript React Flowbite Tailwind Firebase - Auth, Database, and Hosting Vite
-
Show HN: Brutalisthackernews.com β A HN reader inspired by brutalist web design
- Performance is a feature.
Another common interpretation of brutalism is aesthetic, reacting to overly complicated user interfaces by creating simpler, more direct ones. Tailwind CSS (https://tailwindcss.com), one of today's most popular CSS libraries, promotes this approach in its component examples. There's also a neat library I've seen recently called "Neobrutalism Components" for React that I like (https://neobrutalism-components.vercel.app), providing components with a similar look and feel to Gumroad. This might more accurately be called 'Neo-Brutalism,' as noted in the comments.
A more engineering-centric interpretation of Brutalism focuses on form, structure, and efficiency, drawing significantly from brutalist architecture principles. Apart from the user interface itself, most mobile, desktop, and web applications are extremely bloated and often perform worse than sites from 10 years ago did. While one HTML file might be "less brutalist" than the original HN site, it is substantially more brutalist than any HN mobile app in existence, and offers nearly identical functionality.
A broader interpretation of brutalism, which could be termed 'Meta-Brutalism,' is embodied in the overall experience on this site through UX flows. Yes, in the strictest sense, the original HN site is more Brutalist in many ways, but it only shows 30 articles at a time and does not function as a PWA. For this site, the experience of reading 10 stories is arguably less brutalist, but for quickly browsing through several pages and skimming articles (which is how I read HN) it is a lot faster, and in my opinion, more Brutalist.
My primary inspiration was addressing software and tool bloat in UIs rather than strictly adhering to every principle set forth by David Bryant Copeland. I don't find it convincing that this site "isn't brutalist" compared to really any other experience apart from the Main HN site, and I would argue the overall experience is more brutalist in its performance and scrolling behavior.
As a side note: I generally don't like Brutalist architecture that much although I believe it is unfairly maligned. I visited the Salk Institute once and enjoyed it though (https://www.archdaily.com/61288/ad-classics-salk-institute-l...).
What are some alternatives?
upload-artifact
flowbite - Open-source UI component library and front-end development framework based on Tailwind CSS
sccache - Sccache is a ccache-like tool. It is used as a compiler wrapper and avoids compilation when possible. Sccache has the capability to utilize caching in remote storage environments, including various cloud storage options, or alternatively, in local storage.
antd - An enterprise-class UI design language and React UI library
act - Run your GitHub Actions locally π
unocss - The instant on-demand atomic CSS engine.
actions-runner-controller - Kubernetes controller for GitHub Actions self-hosted runners
windicss - Next generation utility-first CSS framework.
setup-buildx-action - GitHub Action to set up Docker Buildx
emotion - π©βπ€ CSS-in-JS library designed for high performance style composition
checkout - Action for checking out a repo
Material UI - Ready-to-use foundational React components, free forever. It includes Material UI, which implements Google's Material Design.