c2ats VS Obsidian

Compare c2ats vs Obsidian and see what are their differences.

c2ats

generate ATS interface from C code (by metasepi)
Language
Source Code
Suggest alternative
Edit details

Obsidian

Obsidian Language Repository (by svenssonjoel)
Language
Source Code
Suggest alternative
Edit details
InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
c2ats Obsidian
- 1
18 40
- -
0.0 0.0
over 7 years ago almost 6 years ago
ATS Haskell
GNU General Public License v3.0 only BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

c2ats

Posts with mentions or reviews of c2ats. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.

We haven't tracked posts mentioning c2ats yet.
Tracking mentions began in Dec 2020.

Obsidian

Posts with mentions or reviews of Obsidian. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-04-06.
  • Is there any hard evidence that functional programming is better?
    2 projects | /r/functionalprogramming | 6 Apr 2021
    It got them 11 votes up. I asked to actually make this argument and received -4. Both sides of the claim are false, the left witnessed by things like Copilot and Obsidian, the right by the criticism of the functional style by Jon Harrop. If this is what you mean by «that is the point most of the comments tried to make» then, well, they should try harder if intellectual honesty and integrity are sought at all.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing c2ats and Obsidian you can also consider the following projects:

elm-get

copilot - A stream-based runtime-verification framework for generating hard real-time C code.

language-ecmascript - Haskell library: ECMAScript parser, pretty-printer and additional tools

really-simple-xml-parser - A really simple xml parser in Haskell using Parsec

haskell-src-exts - Manipulating Haskell source: abstract syntax, lexer, parser, and pretty-printer

toml-parser - Haskell parser and printer for the TOML 1.0.0 file format

nirum - Nirum: IDL compiler and RPC/distributed object framework for microservices

resin - Resin: high performance variable binder and ast manipulation lib

camfort - Light-weight verification and transformation tools for Fortran

hfmt - Format Haskell programs. Inspired by the gofmt utility.

shentong - A Haskell implementation of the Shen programming language.

bash

c2ats vs elm-get Obsidian vs copilot c2ats vs language-ecmascript Obsidian vs really-simple-xml-parser c2ats vs haskell-src-exts Obsidian vs toml-parser c2ats vs nirum Obsidian vs resin c2ats vs camfort Obsidian vs hfmt c2ats vs shentong Obsidian vs bash