blockprotocol VS awesome-jsonschema

Relevant to this conversation, I saw Joel Spolsky giving a talk about his new big project/stab at addressing this problem The Block Protocol.

1) The spec says that a block package includes its source code, and the block hub seems to be a browser of block packages, but it doesn't give me the full view into said block packages. Is there a reason for this? Is it on the to-do list?

It's on the to-list indeed - we are going to add links to the source of blocks. The package for distribution will typically be minified and less illuminating, although we can look to expose that too (as well as making it available for request via the API).

2) What's going on with the type signatures here?

The type signatures on functions in the spec definitely need cleaning up to be consistent and more helpful. They are pseudo-code. There are TypeScript types for them (https://github.com/blockprotocol/blockprotocol/blob/main/pac...) which won't be much use to you, but I am including in case they are of someone else.

The schema you mention in the Hub is autogenerated from the TypeScript interface for the block, which can lead to weird artefacts of the sort you identify. We need to add custom codegen to better handle this. It should valid JSON Schema.

Truth. Zod is comparable to JSON Schema plus AJV, and it doesn't compare well at all. Your Zod code is all locked inside TypeScript so not only can it not be shared to any other language in your stack but it also cannot be serialized, which introduces many limitations. You also miss out on all the JSON Schema ecosystem tooling. (1, 2) For example the intellisense you get in VS Code for config files is powered by JSON Schema and schemastore.

The very first line of text below the header on the json-schema.org homepage is:

The framework's official website mentions a number of pros of FastAPI. In my opinion, the most useful features from a microservice perspective are: the simplicity of code (easy to use and avoid boilerplate), high operational capacity thanks to Starlette and Pydantic and compatibility with industry standards - OpenAPI and JSON Schema.

I've used Felte to reduce form boilerplate. Felte supports several different validation libraries like Zod. I actually used a custom validation function with ajv (which uses JSON schema).

(There is already a JSON Schema definition at https://json-schema.org/)

Like you said - standard XML isn't terrible. Adding on an XSD isn't terrible, because now you can enforce structure and datatypes on files provided by outside parties. Creating an XSLT is much more of a mental challenge, and probably should be left to tools to define.

Anything beyond those technologies is someone polishing up their resume.

While the aws-sdk is being installed to simulate DynamoDB locally, let me explain a few things about this command. First Comment will be the name of the model the scaffold creates. This model will be codified under app/models/schemas/comment.mjs as a JSON Schema object. Each of the parameters after Comment will be split into a property name and type (e.g. property name “subject”, property type “string”). This JSON Schema document will be used to validate the form data both on the client and server sides.

What you are looking is called Json-schema. Have a look at the implementations page, which will give you an idea of what you can do with json-schema, which also includes UI rendering.