blockdom
webcomponents
blockdom | webcomponents | |
---|---|---|
5 | 34 | |
519 | 4,312 | |
- | 0.2% | |
4.6 | 4.4 | |
8 months ago | 3 months ago | |
TypeScript | HTML | |
MIT License | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
blockdom
-
Unleashing Million.js v2.0.0
blockdom (Géry Debongnie) Thank you to Géry pioneering the concept of "blocks" in the virtual DOM. Many parts of the Million.js codebase either directly or indirectly derive from his work.
-
React creates better user experience?
this is 100% false, look at the js framework benchmark and u'll see that vanilla-js with DOM is faster than any other framework and almost twice as fast as react. not that VDOM is slow its just that react's implementation is slow. blockdom for example uses VDOM and its very close to vanilla's performance
-
Exploring Blockdom: Fastest Virtual DOM (ever!)
If you've been around in the JavaScript UI library development space, you've likely heard about blockdom, which claims to be probably the fastest Virtual DOM that currently exists.
- Tutorial "Make your own framework": 250 loc, with components, reactivity, effects, scheduling, ...
- can a virtualdom beat solid js? introducing blockdom, a fast virtualdom library
webcomponents
- "open-stylable" Shadow Roots · Issue #909 · WICG/webcomponents
-
Web Components Eliminate JavaScript Framework Lock-In
It's not all that shiny. Web components have global names (you should pretty much apply a prefix/namespace if you want to work with others) and managing multiple version of the same component in the same page is an issue in any non trivial codebase (either use a different name per version or fix all breaking changes at once during the upgrade, unless the draft about scoping web elements became standard https://github.com/WICG/webcomponents/blob/gh-pages/proposal... )
-
HTML Web Components
I've recently just started playing with Web Components without a build environment. Meaning, no npm, no bun, no webpack, etc, and no dependencies; in typescript. Intellij can autocompile down to js and the browser view injects a small onchange handler for live updates when developing. So far no problems.
The only thing holding web components back seems to be HTML Modules; being able to link to a .html file instead of a .js file to import a web component. Because of this if you want to use templates or anything more complicated you need to do the ugly inject of .innerHtml = `...`, which I thought would be a problem but the IDE parses the template string very nicely. It would be great to make a component in HTML and any javascript you would put in a tag. It seems like there a lot of bureaucracy involved in getting HTML Modules out the door since its been eight years.<p><a href="https://github.com/WICG/webcomponents/blob/gh-pages/proposals/html-modules-explainer.md#high-level-summary">https://github.com/WICG/webcomponents/blob/gh-pages/proposal...</a>
-
Lit 3 Release Announcement
We're trying to advocate for greater flexibility in cross-component styling. One proposal is "open styleable shadow-roots" which would be an opt-in to let styles from above a component to apply to it's shadow root. I think this would help migration in situations where app teams are currently using global stylesheets.
Feedback and support of the need for something like this would help a lot: https://github.com/WICG/webcomponents/issues/909
-
Things you forgot because of React
))
Part 1.
> I honestly believe that 90% of the dislike for WC comes from the name "connectedCallback". If they'd named it "onCreate" or something, everyone would be using it
Of course not. None of the criticism towards Web Components ever mentions "connectedCallback", or how it should be named differently.
Do you know the actual reason so few are using them? Let's skip the atrocious not-really-high-level not-really-low-level imperative API that they offer.
How about:
- 13 years after introduction they still need 20 more specs to try and patch just some of the holes in their original design: https://w3c.github.io/webcomponents-cg/2022.html
- Shadow DOM is infecting every spec so that the actual useful specs like Scoped CSS have to be delayed almost indefinitely to try and figure out how to work with this abomination of a design
To quote the report linked above, "many of these pain points are directly related to Shadow DOM's encapsulation"
- The amount of specs that are required to make them work, barely, and be "good web citizens". And the amount of APIs.
Oh, you want your custom input to a) be able to send its data in a form, and b) be accessible to a label outside of your component? Well, there's a separate API for a) and there's some separate future API for b). And meanwhile your custom button won't be able to submit your form, sorry, it's a 4-year old issue with no solution: https://github.com/WICG/webcomponents/issues/814
And all that despite the fact that there are already a dozen specs covering web components, and dozens more on their way.
- Web Components ar HTMLElement. It means you cannot use them inside SVGs.
This is impossible:
-
Building a Front End Framework; Reactivity, Composability with No Dependencies
The lit-plugin in for VS Code offers syntax highlighting, jumpt-to-definition, etc: https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=runem.li...
Prettier already supports HTML in html`` strings, likewise, CSS.
> Is there a way in Lit to write the templates in regular HTML rather than a string?
This would require a compiler. You would need to load the HTML into the JS module graph and JS can't do that yet, though there is a proposal for it: https://github.com/WICG/webcomponents/blob/gh-pages/proposal...
Template in HTML also have the problem of the data not being in scope as it is in JS, and there not being an expression language. So you ned up having to re-implement a lot of JS embedded into the HTML syntax, which then preferences a compiler-based approach to make fast. It turns out to be a lot simpler to embed HTML in JS.
-
I am experimenting with Typescript. Is this way of defining a constructor considered normal or an abomination?
It's more than just sugar now. You can't even write web components functionally: https://github.com/WICG/webcomponents/issues/587
-
Declarative Shadow DOM
gzip/brotli handles this very well, but it still is text to parse through.
Some form of declarative CSS module scripts would help a lot. A feature request for that here: https://github.com/WICG/webcomponents/issues/939
- risk of accessible components
-
Templating in HTML
In the past I've seen this one:
https://github.com/WICG/webcomponents/blob/gh-pages/proposal...
Perhaps there are more recent versions.
I liked the spirit of the proposal, but never studied it.
What are some alternatives?
snabbdom - A virtual DOM library with focus on simplicity, modularity, powerful features and performance.
stencil - A toolchain for building scalable, enterprise-ready component systems on top of TypeScript and Web Component standards. Stencil components can be distributed natively to React, Angular, Vue, and traditional web developers from a single, framework-agnostic codebase.
virtual-dom - A Virtual DOM and diffing algorithm
WHATWG HTML Standard - HTML Standard
million - Optimize React performance and make your React 70% faster in minutes, not months.
custom-elements - All inclusive customElements polyfill for every browser
shoelace-css - A collection of professionally designed, every day UI components built on Web standards. SHOELACE IS BECOMING WEB AWESOME. WE ARE LIVE ON KICKSTARTER! 👇👇👇
design-reviews - W3C specs and API reviews
eureka - Lucene-based search engine for your source code
marimo - A reactive notebook for Python — run reproducible experiments, execute as a script, deploy as an app, and version with git.
dom - DOM Standard
solid-docs - Cumulative documentation for SolidJS and related packages.