awesome-jsonschema
json5
awesome-jsonschema | json5 | |
---|---|---|
70 | 94 | |
101 | 6,291 | |
4.0% | 0.7% | |
5.3 | 0.0 | |
8 months ago | 5 months ago | |
Handlebars | JavaScript | |
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
awesome-jsonschema
- YAML or JSON files that are typed?
- Parse, Don't Validate (2019)
-
The Last Breaking Change | JSON Schema Blog
Truth. Zod is comparable to JSON Schema plus AJV, and it doesn't compare well at all. Your Zod code is all locked inside TypeScript so not only can it not be shared to any other language in your stack but it also cannot be serialized, which introduces many limitations. You also miss out on all the JSON Schema ecosystem tooling. (1, 2) For example the intellisense you get in VS Code for config files is powered by JSON Schema and schemastore.
The very first line of text below the header on the json-schema.org homepage is:
-
How to use FastAPI for microservices in Python
The framework's official website mentions a number of pros of FastAPI. In my opinion, the most useful features from a microservice perspective are: the simplicity of code (easy to use and avoid boilerplate), high operational capacity thanks to Starlette and Pydantic and compatibility with industry standards - OpenAPI and JSON Schema.
-
How to handle forms in a good way?
I've used Felte to reduce form boilerplate. Felte supports several different validation libraries like Zod. I actually used a custom validation function with ajv (which uses JSON schema).
-
A Brief Defense of XML
(There is already a JSON Schema definition at https://json-schema.org/)
Like you said - standard XML isn't terrible. Adding on an XSD isn't terrible, because now you can enforce structure and datatypes on files provided by outside parties. Creating an XSLT is much more of a mental challenge, and probably should be left to tools to define.
Anything beyond those technologies is someone polishing up their resume.
-
On the seventh day of Enhancing: Forms
While the aws-sdk is being installed to simulate DynamoDB locally, let me explain a few things about this command. First Comment will be the name of the model the scaffold creates. This model will be codified under app/models/schemas/comment.mjs as a JSON Schema object. Each of the parameters after Comment will be split into a property name and type (e.g. property name “subject”, property type “string”). This JSON Schema document will be used to validate the form data both on the client and server sides.
-
Server Sent UI Schema Driven UIs
What you are looking is called Json-schema. Have a look at the implementations page, which will give you an idea of what you can do with json-schema, which also includes UI rendering.
- Tool to document Firestore 'schema'
json5
- JSON5 – JSON for Humans
- Why the fuck are we templating YAML? (2019)
-
I pre-released my project "json-responder" written in Rust
JSON5 support
-
topoconfig: enhancing config declarations with graphs
Meanwhile, formats have been evolving (JSON5, YAML), config entry points are constantly changing. These fluctuations, fortunately, were covered by tools like the cosmiconfig.
-
That's a Lot of YAML
I think JSON5 is fairly close to this: https://json5.org
I reckon the only thing it's missing to be truly accessible to non-techies is that string values still need to be quoted, i.e. you can't have:
key: this is my value
(I'm definitely not saying it would be a good idea to allow quotes to be dropped, just that that's the only potential stumbling block I see for non-techies.)
-
XML is better than YAML
I believe that's JSON5.
https://github.com/json5/json5
It's my preferred configuration file format, it fixes all the problems I have with JSON (trailing commas, comments) without turning it into a mess full of gotchas like YAML.
- Fx – Terminal JSON Viewer
- What Is Wrong with TOML?
-
🚀 'GET' API in API Maker
JSON 5 support
-
TySON: a native go library that lets you use TypeScript as an embedded configuration language without depending on Node or V8
I would like to see mention of JSON5 which is 11 years its elder. For comments in JSON, JSON5 is a good starting point.
What are some alternatives?
zod - TypeScript-first schema validation with static type inference
Json.NET - Json.NET is a popular high-performance JSON framework for .NET
ajv - The fastest JSON schema Validator. Supports JSON Schema draft-04/06/07/2019-09/2020-12 and JSON Type Definition (RFC8927)
hjson-js - Hjson for JavaScript
JSON-Schema Faker - JSON-Schema + fake data generators
jq - Command-line JSON processor [Moved to: https://github.com/jqlang/jq]
fastify-swagger - Swagger documentation generator for Fastify
toml - Tom's Obvious, Minimal Language
pydantic - Data validation using Python type hints
jsonnet - Jsonnet - The data templating language
Superstruct - A simple and composable way to validate data in JavaScript (and TypeScript).
sublime-hjson - Hjson support for Sublime Text