async_io_uring VS io_uring-echo-server

Compare async_io_uring vs io_uring-echo-server and see what are their differences.

InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
async_io_uring io_uring-echo-server
2 1
103 358
- -
0.0 3.6
over 1 year ago 3 months ago
Zig C
MIT License MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

async_io_uring

Posts with mentions or reviews of async_io_uring. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.

io_uring-echo-server

Posts with mentions or reviews of io_uring-echo-server. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-03-08.
  • Put an io_uring on it: Exploiting the Linux Kernel
    3 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 8 Mar 2022
    > Network IO discussion: https://github.com/axboe/liburing/issues/536

    I see an issue with a narrative but zero discussion at that link.

    Furthermore, your io_uring benchmark being utilized in that issue isn't even batching CQE consumption. I've submitted a quick and dirty untested PR adding rudimentary batching at [0]. Frankly, what seems to be a constant din of poorly-written benchmarks portraying io_uring in a negative light vs. epoll is getting rather old.

    [0] https://github.com/frevib/io_uring-echo-server/pull/16

What are some alternatives?

When comparing async_io_uring and io_uring-echo-server you can also consider the following projects:

libxev - libxev is a cross-platform, high-performance event loop that provides abstractions for non-blocking IO, timers, events, and more and works on Linux (io_uring or epoll), macOS (kqueue), and Wasm + WASI. Available as both a Zig and C API.

rio - pure rust io_uring library, built on libc, thread & async friendly, misuse resistant

zig-network - A smallest-common-subset of socket functions for crossplatform networking, TCP & UDP

liburing

zig-clap - Simple command line argument parsing library

python-c-io_uring-example - Using io_uring Linux Kernel interface from Python by JITing C code with MetaCall.

capy - 💻Build one codebase and get native UI on Windows, Linux and Web

kbio - Another Async IO Framework based on io_uring

microzig - Unified abstraction layer and HAL for several microcontrollers

io-uring - The `io_uring` library for Rust

Polyphony - Fine-grained concurrency for Ruby

ioucontext - A coöperative multitasking framework based on `liburing` and `libucontext`