animate.css VS barba

Animate.css

Animate.css (https://animate.style/)

Now, the content slide animation will come in later, as shown below: How about creating an altogether custom animation? Let’s make a bounce animation.

There are a few ways to create animations in React, but all of them fall into two broad categories: CSS animations, which change visual state by applying CSS rules; and, JavaScript animations, which use JavaScript to change the properties of the element. In either of those categories, you can either implement the animation from scratch, or you can use a library. On the CSS side, you can compose your animations with CSS rules, or you can use third-party libraries like Animate.css.

Use actual CSS/JS to make the effects. You can learn most of it if you search for CSS3 animations (Mozilla dev docs are a good option). You could also use a library like Animate.css

Animate.css: This CSS animation library offers different pre-built animations that can be easily applied to elements on a website. Different animations in the library, such as fades, slides, flips, and more, can be used to animate CSS Grid layouts.

Create badass, fluid and smooth transitions between your website's pages (https://barba.js.org) by Thierry Michel, Xavier Foucrier, Luigi De Rosa This one is really good - just the minimum API to make these transitions so good.

Sure, you can use any number of JS-avoidance libraries. I'm a fan of Turbo, and there's also htmx, Unpoly, Alpine, hyperscript, swup, barba.js, and probably others.

It's using Highway.js or Barba.js I am not using any framework on this project.

Have a look at https://barba.js.org or https://youtu.be/fBU4mLX45HU

barba.js

i think these statistics are not a good guide - it says that barba was last updated 6 years ago, while the last update was actually 17h ago