angular-cli VS platform

module.exports = async (util, rule, host, injector) => { let list = await util.changeList([ { type: 'copy', source: 'git', from: { url: 'https://github.com/angular/angular-cli.git', match: '/packages/schematics/angular/directive/files', output: '/packages/schematics/angular/directive/files', }, pathTemplate: '@angular-devkit', contentTemplate: '@angular-devkit', pathTemplateSuffix: '.template', templateContext: { name: 'hello', standalone: true, selector: 'hello', 'if-flat': (input) => '' }, to: './hello-directive' }, ]); await util.updateChangeList(list); };

Well, scream though I have, the Angular team desperately needs to Remove NodeJS Dependencies, as it has already fallen behind from all frameworks concerning deployment. I'm still waiting for the response on this... 🦗 🦗 🦗 🦗

PR: feat(@angular-devkit/build-angular): add define build option to application builder

The new ssr CommonEngine source code

Source: https://github.com/angular/angular-cli/issues/25134

I'm not sure how to solve this but here's something that looks similar to your issue - https://github.com/angular/angular-cli/issues/24373

Sass errors after migrating from Angular 13 to 15 / Node 14 to 18

Edit: Found it at Github https://github.com/angular/angular-cli/issues/25574. So it seems to be a problem

Remove Dependencies for NodeJs

Is it possible to teach llm to read issues and answer questions such as how do I get angular 17 to output to dist instead of dist/browser with you can't do this with angular. However, in your CI CD pipeline, you can do a mv or robocopy or bla bla bla depending on context?

https://github.com/angular/angular-cli/issues/26028

It would be very useful because there are so many edge cases that aren't covered in the docs but are probably available in some kind of WON'T FIX issues.

NgRx is the standard library for state management in Angular applications. With NgRx v14, many of the complex APIs following the Redux pattern have been greatly simplified. For example, ActionGroups make it easier to define new actions. However, the use of the Redux pattern is by no means easy and discourages many developers.

I ran into this question question on the NgRx GitHub discussion threads which asked:

In an application that I’m working on, before Angular 16 shipped, I was using a custom StoreService to hold global application state. I’ve tried libraries like NgRx and Akita to manage global state, but found them to be way too heavy-handed for what I wanted (not saying ANYTHING negative towards these libraries; not every tool is right for every job, and the authors of these libraries would probably be the first to tell you that). This custom StoreService was created using RxJS, and looked like this:

RFC Signal Store

If you liked this, click the ❤️ so other people will see it. Follow me on Twitter and subscribe to my YouTube Channel for content on Angular, Analog, NgRx, and more!

The store can be implemented using any technology. You can either use a library like NgRx or NGXS. Another solution is to create your own store using a BehaviorSubject.

I'm using @ngrx/router-store in my Angularv5 app and I recently started running into a an error: Navigation ID X is not equal to the current navigation id Y (where X and Y are integers).

Not agree, NgRx and redux pattern helps a lot to keep the code clean, I do agree that maybe NgRx add many files and could become in boilperplate for simple staff, I think with signals this approach will change, there is already an open discussion about this https://github.com/ngrx/platform/discussions/3796

For code sample and how to architect these things : https://ngrx.io

The NgRx team and Marko Stanimirović opened a new RFC (Request for Comments) for a signal-based state management solution, SignalStore. It has a similar approach to @ngrx/component-store. The initial prototype with the API documentation is available in the NgRx SignalStore playground repo.