amplify-flutter VS apollo-server

AWS Amplify - Build apps with cloud features by Amazon Web Services

Together these updates speed up building fullstack applications on AWS. We’d love to hear your feedback as you build! To learn more, visit our docs site!

In this blog post we’ve learned about Amplify Studio forms, how to customize them and how to add additional validation error messages. If you’d like to learn more about Amplify in general please check out the official docs. You can also check the Amplify Studio tutorial for more information on how to use it.

You might find it easier using AWS Amplify https://docs.amplify.aws/

We do not have support for Geo queries, please upvote this Github issue https://github.com/aws-amplify/amplify-flutter/issues/2495,

Deploying a Next.js application can be a daunting task for developers if you are not using Vercel. But with Amazon Amplify, you can easily and quickly deploy your app without sacrificing key functionalities such as ISR, SSR, and other Next.js goodies.

If you're looking to learn more about Amplify, head to our docs and join our Discord community.

Amplify, on the other hand, is a set of tools that allows full-stack web and mobile developers the ability to create and build apps using AWS services.

Amplify is a set of tools that allows full-stack web and mobile developers to create and build apps. It makes using AWS services, like our Cognito identity and access management service, or our managed GraphQL service AppSync, much simpler and straight forward to use.

Hello, thank you for your comment! It is in our radar, we will do our best to bring support for Amplify Push Notifications as soon as we can. You can check the GitHub issue for further updates --> https://github.com/aws-amplify/amplify-flutter/issues/319

Another interesting point is that executing fetches on the server can allow developers to more easily leverage caching. Next.js already handles caching out-of-the-box and I’m curious to see if the wider adoption of RSC reduces the need to combine React with solutions like Apollo Server and Apollo Client. While there are other benefits to these tools, RSC could provide similar caching behavior without the need to invest in a GraphQL solution.

There are several GraphQL server implementations, however, for this tutorial, we'll utilize Apollo GraphQL's Apollo Server, a lightweight and flexible JavaScript server that makes it easy to build GraphQL APIs.

As I mentioned, their main GraphQL server package is[1], so that's where the confusion came from. Thanks.

[1] https://github.com/apollographql/apollo-server/blob/9817bc47...

While working on this blog post, I learned that Apollo Server, the most popular GraphQL server for typescript, uses a similar method for adding error codes to GraphQL. It even lets you add custom errors. Hopefully, someday other GraphQL server projects will follow them. Until then, we’ve got a strong indication we took the right approach.

GraphQL is just a schema, there are many different implementations of a GraphQL server, AppSync being one of them. I mentioned Apollo server in this series as well.

After some head-scratching, I opened an issue on Apollo Server’s GitHub repository. There, Apollo Server contributor @​glasser shared a helpful suggestion: why not invoke our AuthPlugin from Apollo Server’s context function? Throwing from context would ensure we can control the HTTP status response without having to introduce more methods and error checks to our AuthPlugin (like unexpectedErrorProcessingRequest). With that suggestion in mind, we rewrote our AuthPlugin as follows:

Apollo as a middleware in Express.js, actually.

Apollo Server 3 Cookie Issue #5775

Lastly, instead of writing our API core ourselves, we'll be using the star of this episode --- Apollo Server (a.k.a. GraphQL server). It has detailed documentation available here.