agile VS TypeScript-Website

If you want to know more checkout this repo:https://github.com/agile-ts/agile

I was wondering about this weird question as I'm trying to build a fast State-Management framework. And currently, I'm micro optimizing it to make it as fast as possible.

I faced the same issue, and so I created a State Management library (AgileTs) based on the neat atom concept of Recoil. AgileTs isn't bound to React, and therefore the global States can be modified and accessed outside the React tree.

Doucmentation

This allows you to preview and edit your global bound States at runtime. For example, the core of the AgileTs documentation is globally bound for better debugging. Note that you should avoid attaching your application States to the globalThis in production because then third parties can easily interfere in your internal application logic. Since the AgileTs documentation has no vulnerable logic under the hood, the core is also accessible in production. Thus you can play around with the AgileTs documentation core and, for example, update the NPM_DOWNLOADS State or update the astronaut color.

It might sound self-indulgent, but my favorite State Manager is, of course, the one I've created myself called AgileTs. It's a singleton-based State Manager, which means your States are singletons, and are not tied to a single source of truth store object. This gives you much more flexibility in structuring your store the way you need it. Here are some Style Guides on how you might structure your application using such a singleton State Management approach \^)

Well.. AgileTs is a simple state manager that is supposed to be an alternative to redux, mobx and zustand..

Well.. that depends on the project.. (In my opinion) There is often no need for external dependencies on small projects like a single-page application, apart from nextjs, (since I want good performance). If it's a more significant project with more advanced logic, I always have a State Management Framework like AgileTs in action because passing states through multiple components is annoying. Regarding UI components, I try to build my own components as much as possible and only use external components if these correspond precisely to my needs. For instance, toastify is often an external dependency in my projects.

For new components, it does make sense to follow the style defined in the React documentation by writing components using a function definition. However, arrow functions using React.FC also remain a popular choice and are used by Vercel and the official TypeScript website

I opened a pull request to remove that, because you're right, there's no way somebody can read the whole handbook in 30 minutes!

Yep, this is my answer too - I use this pattern pretty often. For example, here's the main object that represents the TypeScript Playground at runtime: https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript-website/blob/86901a0520855050b16b0c23bd6923212fdd0c9c/packages/playground/src/index.ts#L622-L623

In this series of articles, I intend to provide a detailed, accurate, and step-by-step explanation of how to implement a RESTful web interface using a stack of Typescript, Node.js, Dynamoose, DynamoDB, Jest, Serverless Framework, AWS, and Amazon Cognito.

Install TypeScript package: npm i -D typescript

Beyond testing your code, it's an excellent idea to write your library in TypeScript. Type errors are among the most common type of mistake in JavaScript, so using TypeScript will almost always reduce development time and may occasionally prevent you from publishing broken code if you forget to add a test. Moreover, the excellent TypeScript compiler will allow you to avoid using a bundler when publishing your package (we'll get into this more later) and will make supporting TypeScript and JavaScript users simultaneously much easier.

TypeScript is a JavaScript superset with optional type annotations checked during transpilation.