Tidier.jl VS Lux.jl

Compare Tidier.jl vs Lux.jl and see what are their differences.

Tidier.jl

Meta-package for data analysis in Julia, modeled after the R tidyverse. (by TidierOrg)
InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
Tidier.jl Lux.jl
5 4
492 436
4.7% 6.4%
8.5 9.6
8 days ago 2 days ago
Julia Julia
MIT License MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

Tidier.jl

Posts with mentions or reviews of Tidier.jl. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-12-27.
  • Tidier.jl: Meta-package for data analysis in Julia, modeled after R tidyverse
    1 project | news.ycombinator.com | 15 Feb 2024
  • Julia 1.10 Released
    15 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 27 Dec 2023
    btw, there has been a pretty nice effort of reimplementing the tidyverse in julia with https://github.com/TidierOrg/Tidier.jl and it seems to be quite nice to work with, if you were missing that from R at least
  • Pandas vs. Julia – cheat sheet and comparison
    7 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 17 May 2023
    Indeed DataFrames.jl isn't and won't be the fastest way to do many things. It makes a lot of trade offs in performance for flexibility. The columns of the dataframe can be any indexable array, so while most examples use 64-bit floating point numbers, strings, and categorical arrays, the nice thing about DataFrames.jl is that using arbitrary precision floats, pointers to binaries, etc. are all fine inside of a DataFrame without any modification. This is compared to things like the Pandas allowed datatypes (https://pbpython.com/pandas_dtypes.html). I'm quite impressed by the DataFrames.jl developers given how they've kept it dynamic yet seem to have achieved pretty good performance. Most of it is smart use of function barriers to avoid the dynamism in the core algorithms. But from that knowledge it's very clear that systems should be able to exist that outperform it even with the same algorithms, in some cases just by tens of nanoseconds but in theory that bump is always there.

    In the Julia world the one which optimizes to be fully non-dynamic is TypedTables (https://github.com/JuliaData/TypedTables.jl) where all column types are known at compile time, removing the dynamic dispatch overhead. But in Julia the minor performance gain of using TypedTables vs the major flexibility loss is the reason why you pretty much never hear about it. Probably not even worth mentioning but it's a fun tidbit.

    > For what it's worth, data.table is my favourite to use and I believe it has the nicest ergonomics of the three I spoke about.

    I would be interested to hear what about the ergonomics of data.table you find useful. if there are some ideas that would be helpful for DataFrames.jl to learn from data.table directly I'd be happy to share it with the devs. Generally when I hear about R people talk about tidyverse. Tidier (https://github.com/TidierOrg/Tidier.jl) is making some big strides in bringing a tidy syntax to Julia and I hear that it has had some rapid adoption and happy users, so there are some ongoing efforts to use the learnings of R API's but I'm not sure if someone is looking directly at the data.table parts.

  • Tidyverse 2.0.0
    9 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 9 Apr 2023
    “Tidier.jl is a 100% Julia implementation of the R tidyverse mini-language in Julia.”

    https://github.com/TidierOrg/Tidier.jl

  • What's Julia's biggest weakness?
    7 projects | /r/Julia | 18 Mar 2023
    A recent package, Tidier.jl, is coming from a R package developer: https://github.com/kdpsingh/Tidier.jl

Lux.jl

Posts with mentions or reviews of Lux.jl. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-12-27.
  • Julia 1.10 Released
    15 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 27 Dec 2023
  • [R] Easiest way to train RNN's in MATLAB or Julia?
    1 project | /r/MachineLearning | 24 Jan 2023
    There is also the less known Lux.jl package: https://github.com/avik-pal/Lux.jl
  • “Why I still recommend Julia”
    11 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 25 Jun 2022
    Can you point to a concrete example of one that someone would run into when using the differential equation solvers with the default and recommended Enzyme AD for vector-Jacobian products? I'd be happy to look into it, but there do not currently seem to be any correctness issues in the Enzyme issue tracker that are current (3 issues are open but they all seem to be fixed, other than https://github.com/EnzymeAD/Enzyme.jl/issues/278 which is actually an activity analysis bug in LLVM). So please be more specific. The issue with Enzyme right now seems to moreso be about finding functional forms that compile, and it throws compile-time errors in the event that it cannot fully analyze the program and if it has too much dynamic behavior (example: https://github.com/EnzymeAD/Enzyme.jl/issues/368).

    Additional note, we recently did a overhaul of SciMLSensitivity (https://sensitivity.sciml.ai/dev/) and setup a system which amounts to 15 hours of direct unit tests doing a combinatoric check of arguments with 4 hours of downstream testing (https://github.com/SciML/SciMLSensitivity.jl/actions/runs/25...). What that identified is that any remaining issues that can arise are due to the implicit parameters mechanism in Zygote (Zygote.params). To counteract this upstream issue, we (a) try to default to never default to Zygote VJPs whenever we can avoid it (hence defaulting to Enzyme and ReverseDiff first as previously mentioned), and (b) put in a mechanism for early error throwing if Zygote hits any not implemented derivative case with an explicit error message (https://github.com/SciML/SciMLSensitivity.jl/blob/v7.0.1/src...). We have alerted the devs of the machine learning libraries, and from this there has been a lot of movement. In particular, a globals-free machine learning library, Lux.jl, was created with fully explicit parameters https://lux.csail.mit.edu/dev/, and thus by design it cannot have this issue. In addition, the Flux.jl library itself is looking to do a redesign that eliminates implicit parameters (https://github.com/FluxML/Flux.jl/issues/1986). Which design will be the one in the end, that's uncertain right now, but it's clear that no matter what the future designs of the deep learning libraries will fully cut out that part of Zygote.jl. And additionally, the other AD libraries (Enzyme and Diffractor for example) do not have this "feature", so it's an issue that can only arise from a specific (not recommended) way of using Zygote (which now throws explicit error messages early and often if used anywhere near SciML because I don't tolerate it).

    So from this, SciML should be rather safe and if not, please share some details and I'd be happy to dig in.

  • The Julia language has a number of correctness flaws
    19 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 16 May 2022
    Lots of things are being rewritten. Remember we just released a new neural network library the other day, SimpleChains.jl, and showed that it gave about a 10x speed improvement on modern CPUs with multithreading enabled vs Jax Equinox (and 22x when AVX-512 is enabled) for smaller neural network and matrix-vector types of cases (https://julialang.org/blog/2022/04/simple-chains/). Then there's Lux.jl fixing some major issues of Flux.jl (https://github.com/avik-pal/Lux.jl). Pretty much everything is switching to Enzyme which improves performance quite a bit over Zygote and allows for full mutation support (https://github.com/EnzymeAD/Enzyme.jl). So an entire machine learning stack is already seeing parts release.

    Right now we're in a bit of an uncomfortable spot where we have to use Zygote for a few things and then Enzyme for everything else, but the custom rules system is rather close and that's the piece that's needed to make the full transition.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Tidier.jl and Lux.jl you can also consider the following projects:

Julia-DataFrames-Tutorial - A tutorial on Julia DataFrames package

Flux.jl - Relax! Flux is the ML library that doesn't make you tensor

tidytable - Tidy interface to 'data.table'

Enzyme - High-performance automatic differentiation of LLVM and MLIR.

py-shiny - Shiny for Python

julia - The Julia Programming Language

DataFramesMeta.jl - Metaprogramming tools for DataFrames

Enzyme.jl - Julia bindings for the Enzyme automatic differentiator

StatsBase.jl - Basic statistics for Julia

db-benchmark - reproducible benchmark of database-like ops

BetaML.jl - Beta Machine Learning Toolkit