Starter-Kit-V2 VS degit

I got hold of a tutorial (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pGJ6YuXOmtQ&list=WL&index=3) and the person in this, has built a great framework of using ems and a system of using fractional values using LESS and stuff. You can read more about their system here - https://github.com/Oak-Harbor-Kits/Starter-Kit-V2 Their system is incredible, however the tutorial is not.

But what I'd like to do at this point to tie a bow on the whole thing, once you've made any customizations you feel necessary, is commit the whole thing as a degit template. This will help you reuse your template across many happy projects in the future!

The easiest way to follow this guide is to degit a Nextjs boilerplate.

There's a tool for history-less cloning: https://github.com/Rich-Harris/degit

The easiest way is to use degit.

Here I am using degit to bootstrap our Ember app since the ember-cli doesn't allow you to create a new Ember app in the name of app.

Instead of starting from the idea of adopting a monorepo, you probably want to start from your pain points and work backwards from there. Standardizing on initial setup can be done w/ scaffolding tools (e.g. degit). Standardizing on configuration can be done w/ libraries (we do this for eslint, jest, etc). After-the-fact alignment can be done w/ codemods (e.g. jscodeshift) and PR tracking tools (IIRC sourcegraph has an offering like this).

Tools like yeoman, degit, and cargo generate kept me happy for years. They add basic templating capabilities to the standard git clone but they stop there. You’ll be hard pressed to find tools that go beyond setting up a directory structure.

You could use codesandbox for your initial setup or create a local svelte application using the degit tool. Open a new terminal and run the following command: