RoaringBitmap VS asami

I was recently reading about Roaring https://roaringbitmap.org/ which is a highly optimized compressed bitset implementation. I reccomend reading about it if you are interested in this sort of thing. The talk at https://roaringbitmap.org/talks/ is especially good.

However, I would love compressed (not just packed) bitsets too, which is something different to me. I would make it another class with a similar interface, based on something like roaring. It doesn't need to be in the standard, but it would be nice if the API was a such that one could easily swap implementations.

As an aside if you find yourself having to compute them on the fly, know that the Roaring Bitmaps libraries is the way to go [1]. The bitmaps are compressed, and can be streamed directly into SIMD computations (batching XORs and popcnts 256 bits wide!). The Jaccard index is just intersection_len / union_len [2] away

[1] https://roaringbitmap.org/

[2] https://roaringbitmap.readthedocs.io/en/latest/#roaringbitma...

Use a two stage approach, with a bloom/cuckoo filter stored as a https://roaringbitmap.org/ in memory. Then a secondary key/value store on disk (bolt or anything else).

As an aside, if you're dealing with large bit sets, you might also want to evaluate Roaring Bitmaps.

Sidetracking a bit the conversation. What a coincidence that the author (Lemire) is also represented on Today's #1 "Ask HN: What are some cool but obscure data structures you know about?" as he is the main contributor of RoaringBitmap https://github.com/RoaringBitmap/RoaringBitmap and one of the main authors of the data structure.

Unlike some other commenters, I agree that graph models are usually a better fit for most data than relational models. There's been some interesting work in recent years developing this idea: in the Clojure world there's Datomic, XTDB, and a host of competitors, all of which build on work from Semantic Web/SPARQL/triplestores and logic programming. Some are even intended to be used as primary datastores: they support some amount of schema and constraints, have well-defined consistency and ACID guarantees, etc. This makes them unlike graph databases like Neo4J and others, which fill an architectural role more like Elasticsearch as a read-optimization tool. Here's an interesting talk making a case for triple-based databases.

Despite the documentation that exists, I've heard many people who have been confused about how to query Datomic, Datascript, Asami, or other graph databases. So I've made an attempt at explaining it https://github.com/threatgrid/asami/wiki/Introduction

The first Graph implementation for Asami was a simple in-memory data structure, described in my ClojureD talk. The code for this appears in asami.index. This file started much smaller (as referenced above), but has since expanded with the needs extended functionality, such as transactions, and transitive closure operations.